The Blue
and
White
Bainbridge-Guilford Central School District

School News& Notes BUDGET EDITION 2018 • Volume 37, No. 6

2018-2019 Budget Proposal

The Booster Club purchased all-weather chain link fence cups to decorate our fences at both the Football and the Soccer Fields.

Public Budget Hearing Tuesday, May 8, 2018

7:00 p.m.

High School Auditorium

Public Budget Vote Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Noon – 9:00 p.m.

Greenlawn Elementary School
Guilford Town Hall	Kindergarten Cooperation Tree

BainBridge-guilford Central SChool diStriCt 18 JULIAND STREET — BAINBRIDGE, NEW YORK 13733-1097

Jr.-Sr. High School (607) 967-6300

Administrative Offices (607) 967-6321

Telefax (607) 967-4231

Business Offices (607) 967-6335

Guilford Elementary School (607) 895-6700

Greenlawn Elementary School (607) 967-6301

Dear Parents and Community Members,

The Board of Education of the Bainbridge-Guilford Central School District approved an expenditure budget of $18,153,575 for the 2018-2019 school year. This is a 3.04% increase over last year’s budget and will be voted on by the public on Tuesday, May 15, 2018. Drivers of this year’s budget are the voter approved Capital Project from last spring, safety mea-sures discussed at our public safety forum in February, loss of Title I grant funds and the replacing of the Guilford bus garage roof. The Board and administration have worked to control the expenditure growth by optimizing the manner in which curriculum is delivered and by continuously adjusting our programs. The District has been successful in creating a budget that is actually less than our budget from the 2016-2017 school year! This is something we are very proud of! By leasing buses instead of purchasing outright, reviewing and trimming our BOCES budget and switching the district health insurance from NY44 to Excellus BCBS, we have been able to keep the budget increase to a minimum.
Our bringing back special education students to B-G contin-ues to save the District money as well as potentially generate revenue from out-of-district students placed in the classroom in the future. This budget will continue to support its special education summer program, full-day pre-kindergarten, con-tinuing education, elementary science, elementary and middle level information technology instruction, a comprehensive AP program, a comprehensive PK–12 art and music program, and a wide array of extracurricular and athletic activities.
We will continue to invest in our technological infrastruc-ture and equipment over the next several years to keep pace with current technological advances and we have developed a plan to do so. Hopefully much of this cost will be covered with the Smart Schools Bond Act funding. Districts are responsible for fronting the initial technology costs and then will receive reimbursement from the State. With careful management of its resources and continued control of expenditures, the district is well positioned to sustain its high-quality academic programs. The proposed tax levy of $6,435,722 is an increase of $261,048 or 4.23%. The District’s allowable tax levy limit is 4.23%. Please remember the so-called 2% tax cap is a misnomer. A district is able to levy taxes up to the allowable limit with only a simple majority vote. If a district chooses to go over the allowable levy limit, a 60% majority is needed from voters to pass the budget. I invite you to visit our District webpage at www.bgcsd.org to view a video that explains what the tax
levy cap is.

2

The following are the two most common questions I hear regarding the 2% tax cap.
Does the tax cap law mean school tax levies can’t increase by more than 2%?
No, the law does not prohibit tax levy increases greater than 2 percent. Despite how it’s been described by some politicians and the media, the legislation signed into law requires every district to calculate its own “tax levy limit.” Two percent (or the rate of inflation, if less) is just one of eight factors in this calculation. The law also establishes a higher threshold of voter approval for a budget to pass if a district’s proposed tax levy increase (before exemptions outlined in the law) exceeds its individual “tax levy limit.”
What is a “tax levy limit?”

For school districts, the “tax levy limit” is the highest limit a district can propose as part of its annual budget for which only the approval of a simple majority of voters (more than 50%) is required. Any proposed tax levy amount above this limit will require budget approval by a supermajority (60% or more) of voters. Essentially, the “tax levy limit” sets a threshold requir-ing districts to obtain a higher level of community support for a proposed tax levy above a certain amount.
The Board of Education believes this budget is fiscally responsible and offers the best education that the district can afford. The budget recognizes the importance of improving our primary literacy program and increasing our investment in information technology and technology integration in the classroom while maintaining all of our existing programs. We continue to increase our collaboration with other districts and will continue our shift to other cost savings measures in all areas of the budget. The Board of Education believes this proposed budget balances the needs of the children, of the community, and the taxpayers of the district.
I would like to thank our entire district and communities for their continued support of our school and children. We have much to be proud of and none of this would be possible without you. My door is always open and you can call the school at 967-6321 or email me at tryan@bgcsd.org with any questions or suggestions you might have.
The District appreciates the support of the community and encourages all community members to vote on Tuesday, May 15 from Noon-9 PM.
Sincerely, Timothy R. Ryan Superintendent

THE BLUE & WHITE

From the Board of Education
Dear Parents and Community Members,

On behalf of the Board of Education, I would like to thank you for your continued support of the Bainbridge-Guilford Central School District.
The Board of Education strives to provide the best education for all Bainbridge-Guil-ford students, as well as being cognizant of the district taxpayers and our elected duty to be fiscally responsible. The Board has worked diligently with district administra-tors to create the lowest budget and tax levy possible, whilst keeping the safety and future of our school in mind.
The 2018-19 budget includes a tax levy increase of 4.23% which is the calculated tax cap for the District. In March 2017, district voters authorized a building project of $16.5M. The District will be breaking ground on that project just after school releases in June. In addition, the District held a safety forum where many safety sugges-tions were offered by the community. This 4.23% tax increase includes the funding for the start of the $16.5M Capital Project and a small Capital Outlay project next school year to begin addressing some of the safety concerns at the Jr./Sr. High School.
Mr. Ryan has fully outlined the 2018-2019 proposed budget and will present it to the community on May 8, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. The annual budget vote will be held on Tuesday, May 15, from noon to 9:00 p.m. Please come out and vote!
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact any member of the Board of Education or our Superintendent, Mr. Ryan.
Again, thank you for your continued support of the Bainbridge-Guilford School District!
Sincerely, Emily Hall
President, Bainbridge-Guilford

Board of Education

Board Candidates TINA AMMON
Hi my name is Tina Ammon and I currently hold a seat on the Bainbridge-Guilford Board of Education. I am hoping to serve a second term with your support.
I grew up in Walton, but made Bainbridge my home eight years ago where I now reside with my family. I am an elementary school teacher and feel my skills and background in education bring a unique perspective
to the Board. It also reinforces my commitment to children, their academic success and well-being even in the face of opposition. I feel the only way to make a difference is to get involved and I would truly appreciate your sup-port on May 15.

KEITH R. HANVEY

My name is Keith R. Hanvey and I have served the past three years on the District Board of Education.
During this time, I have completed the state mandated training and graduated from the BOCES School Board Academy two-year training course. I also attend many of the Chenango County School Board Association seminars. I have learned a great deal about school board
functions and would like the opportunity to serve another three year term. I have two children who have graduated from B-G. My son Kyle is cur-
rently a Lance Corporal in the U.S. Marine Corps and my daughter Meghan is a Registered Nurse in South Carolina.
We have a great District and I am proud to be a part of the B-G BOE.

REBECCA (COTTER) SULLIVAN

I am a Neonatal Intensive Care Nurse at Wilson Regional Hospital, and a nursing instructor at SUNY Morrisville. I have experience in business management, clinical research and education.
I grew up in Bainbridge, and after graduation went on to receive a Bachelor of Fine Arts from New York University (NYU) and a Bachelor of Science in Nurs-
ing from The University of Pennsylvania. After spending years living and working in New York City and Philadelphia, my husband and I returned to Bainbridge to raise our family. I am running for election to the school board because I want to help assure that children in our community have access to a high-quality educational experience. I believe that a major challenge facing the Bainbridge-Guilford School district is finding just the right balance of academic, co-curricular and extracurricular offerings within a budget that is sustainable. I also believe that our school is one of our community’s greatest assets and I am committed to helping it stay that way.
My husband and I, along with our three children, two of which are fifth graders at Greenlawn Elementary, have been Village of Bainbridge residents
for 11 years.

Join us during the Public Budget Hearing to meet the candidates. Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. • High School Auditorium

THE BLUE & WHITE	3

What items will appear on the Ballot? PROPOSED SCHOOL BUDGET
Residents will have the opportunity to vote on the proposed school budget as outlined in this document. An opportunity to learn more about the proposed budget will be provided at our Public Budget Hearing which will be held in the High School Auditorium on Tuesday, May 8, 2018 starting at 7:00 p.m. In addition to the Public Hearing, please do not hesitate to contact Superintendent Timothy Ryan at 967-6321 if you have any budget questions.

PROPOSITION TO LEASE SCHOOL BUSES

Voters will be presented with a proposition to allow the District to enter into a lease agreement for the replacement of two school buses. The District intends to lease the two buses over a period of five years. The maximum annual cost is not to exceed $30,000 for each of the five years. Lease payments are eligible for Transportation Aid from New York State. The replacement of these vehicles will help the school district maintain a cost effective and safe fleet for the children that we transport throughout our 100 square mile school district.

PROPOSITION TO TRANSFER FUNDS FROM TWO RESERVE FUNDS

Voters will be presented with two separate propositions asking for approval to transfer funds from the existing Property Loss Reserve and Liability Reserve Funds to the General Fund. A finding during the districts’ Independent Audit indicated these two reserves had no purpose for the funds and should be unfunded by voter approval during the 2018-19 budget vote process. If approved for liquidation, the District can then transfer the funds to another reserve in the 2018-19 school year that would better benefit the district. The amounts requested to be transferred is an amount not to exceed $172,000 for the Liability Reserve Fund and an amount not to exceed $133,000 for the Property Loss Reserve Fund.

PROPOSITION TO CREATE 2018

TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE CAPITAL RESERVE FUND

Voters will be presented with a proposition to create a Transportation Vehicle Capital Reserve Fund for the purpose of financing the purchase of school buses, vehicles and equipment. If approved, the reserve fund will be established at an ultimate amount of $3,000,000 inclusive of accrued interest and other investment earnings with a probable term of ten (10) years. A Capital Reserve fund with an ultimate amount means that over ten (10) years the District cannot transfer more than $3,000,000 into the reserve in total. The Independent Auditors suggested this reserve could be funded with monies from the liquidation of the Property Loss Reserve and Liability Reserve if approved by voters. This would enable the District to purchase Transportation vehicles with reserve funds, saving the District the cost of financing vehicles and reducing the capital expenditures in future budgets.

BOARD OF EDUCATION CANDIDATES

There are three Board of Education terms that will expire on June 30, 2018. The following individuals have submitted petitions to fill the available seats on the Board of Education. Board Members are elected at large. The candidates who have submitted petitions are listed below in alphabetical order. The new terms will
be effective July 1, 2018.

Proposal to Continue Leasing School Buses
The Bainbridge-Guilford Central

School District is asking voters to approve the leasing of one (1) full-size 65-passenger propane bus and one (1) 30-passenger gasoline bus. After extensive comparisons of our options, leasing these buses will save the district approximately $10,300 over a five year lease versus pur-chasing the buses. The annual lease payment for the above two buses is estimated not to exceed $30,000. After State Aid, the district will be paying approximately $6,500 per year to lease the two school buses.
Leasing will also allow us to keep our fleet current, on a five year rota-tion plan. New buses will be under a 5-year warranty period allowing the district to reduce the cost of upkeep and repairs.
Voter authorization is needed in order to lease buses in New York State. District voters will see a separate proposition for Bus Leas-ing on the ballot during the budget vote held on Tuesday, May 15. If you have any questions regarding leasing please email Superintendent Tim Ryan at tryan@bgcsd.org or contact
the school at 967-6321.

Tina Ammon	Keith Hanvey	Rebecca Sullivan

You will have an opportunity to hear from our Board of Education candidates during the Public Hearing scheduled for Tuesday, May 9, 2018. The hearing will be held in the Auditorium of the High School starting at 7:00 p.m.

4	THE BLUE & WHITE

Where does the Money Come From?

Other Revenue

1.42%	Fund Balance

Estimated Revenue
	
Category
	Amount ($)
	
NY State Aid
	10,994,057
	
Property Tax
	6,435,722
	
Other Revenue
	257,796
	
Fund Balance
	466,000
	
Total
	18,153,575

2.57%

Property Tax 35.45%

NY State Aid

60.56%

NY STATE AID: State Aid consists of Foundation Aid; BOCES Aid, Hardware and Technology Aid; Excess Cost Aid; Textbook, Software, and Library Aid; Transportation Aid; and Building Aid.

PROPERTY TAXES: The property tax levy limit is calculated by adjusting the current tax levy by the rate of inflation or 2% (whichever is lower) and by any growth in the local tax base. In addition, the District may adjust for any voter-approved capital expenditures, increases in state-mandated employer contribution rates for teacher and employee pensions and any court orders/judgements resulting from tort actions that exceed 5% of the District’s current levy. The calculated tax levy limit for Bainbridge-Guilford is 4.23% for the 2018-19 school year.

OTHER REVENUE: Other revenue consists of estimations on PILOT payments, interest and penalties on taxes, shared services, student fees and charges, admission to athletic events, interest on investments, rental of real property (BOCES and Head Start Classrooms), sale of equipment, refunds from the prior year, gifts and donations, Medicaid reimbursements and any appropriations from reserves.

FUND BALANCE: Fund balance is the amount of money that the District is appropriating from surplus funds of the current year to support the budget for the ensuing school year. The district is appropriating $466,000 towards the 2018-19 budget. A necessary roof and repair project at the Guilford Bus Garage building that is not eligible to receive building aid from New York State accounts for the additional $66,000 that is being appropriated from available fund balance.

Where does the Money go?

Capital

14.84%

Administrative

14.92%

Appropriations
	
Category
	Amount ($)
	
Program
	12,750,187
	
Capital
	2,694,503
	
Administrative
	2,708,885
	
Total
	18,153,575

Program

70.24%

PROGRAM: The Program budget includes expenditures for regular school instruction, programs for handicapped children, occupational education, summer school education, the libraries, computer assisted instruction, pupil services consisting of guidance, counseling, and health services, co-curricular activities, interscholastic athletics, pupil transportation and applicable employee benefits for this category.

CAPITAL: The Capital budget includes the cost of operating and maintaining the District’s buildings and grounds, custodial and grounds-keeping staffing and the applicable employee benefits, money for the payment of outstanding debt (principal and interest) on previous capital projects, and money for small capital outlay projects that may be included in the budget being put forth to voters.

ADMINISTRATIVE: The Administrative budget includes expenditures for the Board of Education, the Superintendent of School’s Office, the Finance Office, records management, public information, legal services, liability and student accident insurance, memberships in various school and educational organizations, the districts share of BOCES administrative costs, building administrators and applicable employee benefits for this category.

THE BLUE & WHITE	5

How will the Budget Affect My Taxes?

The calculated allowable Tax Levy Limit for our school	These are the estimated amounts prior to any property tax

district is 4.23% for the 2018-19 school year. The proposed budget adopted by the Board of Education results in a tax levy increase that is within the district’s allowable Tax Levy Limit. Current tax freeze legislation grants a reimbursement check for school taxes on the primary residences of home-owners in school districts that stay within the allowable tax levy limit. Therefore, district residents that are currently receiving a STAR benefit and whose annual income is at or less than $275,000, are eligible to receive a school tax freeze and relief credit check for the 2018-19 school year.
The chart below is intended to show an estimate of pro-

jected tax increases for homes of different assessed values.

relief credit by the state for qualifying residential properties under the state Property Tax Freeze Credit program.
Actual tax rates are affected by many factors beyond the school district’s control such as Assessed Values, State Equalization Rates, and STAR Exemptions. Actual tax rates will not be set until sometime in August when the state final-izes equalization rates for each of our district’s ten town-ships. The following chart simply displays the amount of a 4.23% increase on varying levels of hypothetical assessed values at Full Market Value.
You can access your B-G tax history

online at www.infotaxonline.com.

HOME VALUE (ASSESSED VALUE)*
	TOTAL TAX BILL
	CHANGE**
	
	CURRENT
	PROPOSED
	ANNUAL
	MONTHLY
	
50,000
	1,008.00
	1,050.50
	42.50
	3.54
	
75,000
	1,512.00
	1,575.75
	63.75
	5.31
	
100,000
	2,016.00
	2,101.00
	85.00
	7.08
	
150,000
	3,024.00
	3,151.50
	127.50
	10.63

*	Assessed values are shown at 100% of Full Market Value (The towns of Bainbridge and Guilford are assessed at Full Value—some district townships assess at less than full value).
** A monthly amount for the tax change is provided as a convenience since most home mortgages are set up with a monthly tax escrow feature.

The “Whos” and “How-tos” of Voting

VOTER QUALIFICATIONS

A person shall be entitled to vote on the appointed date for the election of school district officials, and upon all other
matters which may be in the form of a referendum, who is:

ABSENTEE BALLOTS

A Voter who is registered and who may be unavoidably ABSENT FROM THE COUNTY of residence because of
his/her duties, occupation, business, vacation, attendance

1. A citizen of the United States. 2. Eighteen years of age.
3. A resident within the district for a period of thirty (30) days next pre-ceding the meeting at which he/she
offers to vote.

at college, sickness, disability or detention in jail or prison, may obtain and submit an application for an absentee ballot. The procedure for obtaining an absentee ballot is:
• Obtain and submit an application for an absentee ballot. • If the ballot will be mailed the application must be received no later than the SEVENTH DAY BEFORE THE
ELECTION (May 8, 2018).

• Upon completion of the application, the ballot will be

given to the applicant or, in the case of a written request,

No person shall be determined ineligible to vote by reason of race, creed, color or sex, who has other qualifications in this section.

6

will be mailed to the applicant.

• Completed ballots MUST BE received by the District Clerk not later than 5:00 p.m. on the day of the election (May 15, 2018).
• Please contact the District Clerk by phone at 967-6321 or by mail at BGCSD, 18 Juliand Street, Bainbridge, NY 13733 for more information or to receive an application.

THE BLUE & WHITE

Capital Outlay Projects Continue with a Focus on School Security
The Capital Outlay Project that was approved

by voters in the 2017-18 budget completes the district upgrade to LED lights for all classrooms and conference rooms in the Jr./Sr. High School building—a project that spanned over two school years through two Capital Outlay Projects. The Bainbridge-Guilford Central School District has again included a $100,000 Capital Outlay Project in the 2018-2019 school budget. These smaller projects are very affordable with the State funding approximately 84% of the project for Bainbridge-Guilford. These outlay projects allow the District to continue to upgrade the school facilities independent of the current Capi-tal Building Project.
With the recent threats and school shooting events occurring at school districts in New York State and around the nation, the District held a safety forum on February 27 where the com-munity voiced that the safety of our students and staff is a primary concern. Based on those concerns, the District has shifted the focus for the 2018-19 Capital Outlay Project to the safety and security of our most valuable asset, our students. The proposed Capital Outlay Project for 2018-19 will begin upgrading the Jr./Sr. High School security system with new cameras and a new server. This will be the first of a number of phases to upgrade existing cameras, add more cameras in key areas and provide new servers for storage of camera data throughout all of the
district’s buildings and grounds.

School Security is a Priority at B-G

In response to the recent school shooting in Parkland, Florida and other threats that occurred in our school and districts around our area, Bainbridge-Guilford hosted a Safety Forum on February 27, 2018. The overwhelming consensus of the meeting was the District needed to make the safety and security of our students and staff a priority. To address the concerns of our community, included in the 2018-19 budget is the funding for a School Resource Officer, which the District will research and coordinate over the coming months to be prepared for the start of the next school year. Also included in the 2018-19 budget is funding to begin upgrading the District’s security systems start-ing with the camera systems and door hardening. The NYSAFE Act that was enacted in 2013 includes provisions for increasing the safety and security of our students by providing a building aid incentive for approved expenditures. Acceptable scopes of work include the pur-chase and installation of security cameras, access control systems for main entrances, and door hardening which can include glass films. After careful consideration and planning, the District has included up to $35,000 for the purchase of new security cameras for the Jr./ Sr. High School and $2,000 to purchase door hardening film for the main entrances of all three buildings in the 2018-19 budget. A number of other security initiatives are being planned for the future through the use of the Smart Schools Bond Act allocation. These initiatives include reconstruction of the Greenlawn Elementary School entrance for a more secure transaction area, district-wide telephone and intercom safety system, and the upgrading of the security camera systems in the two Elementary buildings. The District is currently working on the submission of these projects that
will be funded through the

Smart Schools Bond Act.

photo credit: Ricky MacPherson, 2018

B-G students spell out their response to school violence. This photo was sent to the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida in memory of the 17 lives that were lost on February 14, 2018.

THE BLUE & WHITE	7

DCMO BOCES Printing Service
Non-Profit Organization U.S. POSTAGE PA I D Norwich, NY 13815
Permit No. 18

18 JULIAND STREET

BAINBRIDGE, NEW YORK 13733-1097 MAIN OFFICE: 607-967-6300

Welcome FFA!

This spring the Bainbridge-Guilford Central School District has started a brand new Future Farmers of America (FFA) program on campus. The FFA program is open to students in grades 7-12. Our inaugural meeting had 19 students attend! Daisy Marsh Brewer will be advising the club and getting our local chapter off the ground. Daisy was instrumental in securing a $5,000 FFA start-up grant from Cornell University. Funding for the program will come from this grant.
The new FFA program is another way we aim to involve our students and continue to bring new programs and offerings for the betterment of our student body. Please look for FFA involve-ment throughout the entire B-G community.

Gifts from
ACCO BRANDS Corporation!
On September 12, 2017, Guilford walked into the office
to find a large tub and gift wrapped box of school supplies!

8

Current Resident or

ECRWSS Postal Customer

Bring on Welding!

In an effort to offer our students a skill that will benefit them after high school, the B-G District has started a brand new welding program at the Jr./Sr. High School. Students in grades 9-12 will be offered an opportunity to learn welding during the school day. With a very generous donation from the Raymond Corporation in Greene, welders have been implemented into the technology building. The District has installed the necessary electrical hook-ups, purchased needed equipment and will look to begin teaching students in September. The students are very excited and eager to begin this new program at B-G!

Food Drive a HUGE Success! The B-G community was able to serve the
needs of 82 families with children in our District.

THE BLUE & WHITE

Budget Statement

BAINBRIDGE-GUILFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

2018-19 PROPOSED BUDGET

Account	Description

2018 - 19 Proposed

Budget

Administrative Component

1010.400

1010

1040.160

1040

1060.400

1060

1240.150

1240.160

1240.400

1240.450

1240

1310.160

1310.400

1310.450

1310.490

1310

1320.400

1320

1330.400

1330

1345.490

1345

1420.400

1420

1430.400

1430.490

Contractual & Other

BOARD OF EDUCATION

Non-Instructional Salaries

DISTRICT CLERK

Contractual & Other

DISTRICT MEETING

Instructional Salaries

Non-Instructional Salaries

Contractual & Other

Materials & Supplies

CHIEF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR

Non-Instructional Salaries

Contractual & Other

Materials & Supplies

BOCES Services

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Contractual & Other

AUDITING

Contractual & Other

TAX COLLECTOR

BOCES Services

PURCHASING

Contractual & Other

LEGAL

Contractual & Other

BOCES Services

*	10,000.00

****	10,000.00

*	5,117.00

****	5,117.00

*	1,900.00

****	1,900.00

*	141,640.00

*	44,587.00

*	3,650.00

*	1,600.00

****	191,477.00

*	164,966.00

*	14,750.00

*	2,500.00

*	121,586.00

****	303,802.00

*	17,500.00

****	17,500.00

*	4,000.00

****	4,000.00

*	5,229.00

****	5,229.00

*	17,500.00

****	17,500.00

*	2,750.00

*	25,539.00

2018 - 19 Proposed Account	Description	Budget

1430

1460.160

1460.490

1460

1480.160

1480.200

1480.400

1480.450

1480.490

1480

1670.400

1670.450

1670.490

1670

1680.150

1680.200

1680.450

1680.460

1680.490

1680

1910.400

1910

1920.400

1920

1981.490

1981

2010.150

2010

2020.150

2020.160

PERSONNEL	****

Non-Instructional Salaries	*

BOCES Services	*

RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER	****

Non-Instructional Salaries	*

Equipment	*

Contractual & Other	*

Materials & Supplies	*

BOCES Services	*

PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES	****

Contractual & Other	*

Materials & Supplies	*

BOCES Services	*

CENTRAL PRINT & MAILING	****

Instructional Salaries	*

Equipment	*

Materials & Supplies	*

Software	*

BOCES Services	*

CENTRAL DATA PROCESSING	****

Contractual & Other	*

UNALLOCATED INSURANCE	****

Contractual & Other	*

SCHOOL ASSOCIATION DUES	****

BOCES Services	*

BOCES ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS	****

Instructional Salaries	*

CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT & SUPERVISION	****

Instructional Salaries	*

Non-Instructional Salaries	*

28,289.00

3,198.00

8,809.00

12,007.00

4,611.00

3,090.00

1,250.00

600.00

30,485.00

40,036.00

19,796.00

17,250.00

62,500.00

99,546.00

3,090.00

2,000.00

500.00

2,500.00

529,540.00

537,630.00

80,804.00

80,804.00

7,500.00

7,500.00

141,345.00

141,345.00

16,000.00

16,000.00

367,582.00

120,787.00

2018 - 19 Proposed Account	Description	Budget

2020.400

2020.450

2020.490

2020

2060.150

2060.160

2060

2250.150

2250.160

2250

9010.800

9010

9020.800

9020

9030.800

9030

9040.800

9040

9060.800

9060

9061.800

9061

9065.800

9065

9089.800

9089

Contractual & Other	*

Materials & Supplies	*

BOCES Services	*

SUPERVISION - REGULAR SCHOOL	****

Instructional Salaries	*

Non-Instructional Salaries	*

Research, Planning and Evaluation	****

Instructional Salaries	*

Non-Instructional Salaries	*

PROGRAM FOR SWD SCHOOL AGE - SCHOOL YEAR	****

Employee Benefits	*

STATE RETIREMENT	****

Employee Benefits	*

TEACHERS' RETIREMENT	****

Employee Benefits	*

SOCIAL SECURITY	****

Employee Benefits	*

WORKERS' COMPENSATION	****

Employee Benefits	*

HEALTH INSURANCE	****

Employee Benefits	*

FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT FEES	****

Employee Benefits	*

DENTAL INSURANCE	****

Employee Benefits	*

EMPLOYER 403B CONTRIBUTION	****

7,165.00

5,983.00

51,053.00

552,570.00

6,000.00

4,500.00

10,500.00

91,406.00

2,773.00

94,179.00

52,591.00

52,591.00

80,449.64

80,449.64

74,686.00

74,686.00

14,337.00

14,337.00

293,982.00

293,982.00

183.00

183.00

13,325.00

13,325.00

2,400.00

2,400.00

Totals For Administrative Component:	2,708,884.64

2018 - 19 Proposed Account	Description	Budget

Capital Components

1620.160

1620.161

1620.200

1620.400

1620.401

1620.450

1620

1964.400

1964

1983.490

1983

5510.210

5510

9010.800

9010

9030.800

9030

9040.800

9040

9060.800

9060

9061.800

9061

9065.800

9065

9089.800

9089

9901.960

Non-Instructional Salaries

Non-Instructional Salaries

Equipment

Contractual & Other

Utilities

Materials & Supplies

OPERATION OF PLANT

Contractual & Other

REFUND ON REAL PROPERTY TAXES

BOCES Services

BOCES CAPITAL EXPENSES

Purchase of Buses

DISTRCT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES

Employee Benefits

STATE RETIREMENT

Employee Benefits

SOCIAL SECURITY

Employee Benefits

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Employee Benefits

HEALTH INSURANCE

Employee Benefits

FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT FEES

Employee Benefits

DENTAL INSURANCE

Employee Benefits

EMPLOYER 403B CONTRIBUTION

Interfund Transfer for Debt

*	422,603.00

*	125,600.00

*	88,679.00

*	170,225.00

*	389,200.00

*	164,208.00

****	1,360,515.00

*	1,500.00

****	1,500.00

*	276,325.00

****	276,325.00

*	25,000.00

****	25,000.00

*	82,043.00

****	82,043.00

*	41,939.00

****	41,939.00

*	8,051.00

****	8,051.00

*	165,085.00

****	165,085.00

*	103.00

****	103.00

*	7,483.00

****	7,483.00

*	60,131.00

****	60,131.00

*	500,328.00

2018 - 19 Proposed Account	Description	Budget

9901

9950.900

9950

TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE

Interfund Transfer

INTERFUND TRANSFERS

****	500,328.00

*	166,000.00

****	166,000.00

Totals For Capital Component:	2,694,503.00

Program Component

1420.400

1420

2070.150

2070.160

2070.400

2070.400

2070

2110.120

2110.121

2110.130

2110.140

2110.160

2110.200

2110.400

2110.450

2110.470

2110.480

2110.490

2110

2250.150

2250.160

2250.200

Contractual & Other

LEGAL

Instructional Salaries

Non-Instructional Salaries

Contractual & Other

Materials & Supplies

INSERVICE TRAINNG - INSTRUCTION

Teacher Salaries, Kindergarten - Grade 3

Teacher Salaries, Grades 4-6

Teacher Salaries, Grade 7-12

Substitute Teacher Salaries

Non-Instructional Salaries

Equipment

Contractual & Other

Materials & Supplies

Tuition paid to Public Districts in NYS

Textbooks

BOCES Services

TEACHING - REGULAR SCHOOL

Instructional Salaries

Non-Instructional Salaries

Equipment

*	17,500.00

****	17,500.00

*	9,810.00

*	3,000.00

*	22,604.00

*	6,000.00

****	41,414.00

*	1,309,166.00

*	567,982.00

*	1,715,554.00

*	160,000.00

*	197,910.00

*	23,850.00

*	12,894.00

*	78,209.00

*	25,000.00

*	40,692.00

*	188,650.00

****	4,319,907.00

*	570,397.00

*	414,000.00

*	6,500.00

2018 - 19 Proposed Account	Description	Budget

2250.400

2250.450

2250.480

2250.490

2250

2280.490

2280

2330.150

2330.490

2330

2610.150

2610.450

2610.490

2610

2630.220

2630.400

2630.450

2630.460

2630.490

2630

2810.150

2810.160

2810.400

2810.450

2810

2815.160

2815.200

2815.400

2815.450

Contractual & Other	*

Materials & Supplies	*

Textbooks	*

BOCES Services	*

PROGRAM FOR SWD SCHOOL AGE - SCHOOL YEAR	****

BOCES Services	*

OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION (GRADES 9-12)	****

Instructional Salaries	*

BOCES Services	*

TEACHING - SPECIAL SCHOOLS	****

Instructional Salaries	*

Materials & Supplies	*

BOCES Services	*

SCHOOL LIBRARY & AUDIOVISUAL	****

Equipment	*

Contractual & Other	*

Materials & Supplies	*

Software	*

BOCES Services	*

COMPUTER ASSISTED INSTRUCTION	****

Instructional Salaries	*

Non-Instructional Salaries	*

Contractual & Other	*

Materials & Supplies	*

GUIDANCE - REGULAR SCHOOL	****

Non-Instructional Salaries	*

Equipment	*

Contractual & Other	*

Materials & Supplies	*

3,660.00

7,935.00

400.00

931,129.00

1,934,021.00

547,172.00

547,172.00

5,500.00

10,010.00

15,510.00

67,945.00

11,033.00

72,413.00

151,391.00

16,500.00

941.00

25,000.00

23,750.00

179,625.00

245,816.00

244,777.00

30,697.00

10,494.00

6,091.00

292,059.00

138,220.00

950.00

15,900.00

3,580.00

2018 - 19 Proposed Account	Description	Budget

2815.490

2815

2820.150

2820

2825.150

2825

2830.400

2830

2850.150

2850

2855.150

2855.200

2855.400

2855.421

2855.450

2855.490

2855

5510.160

5510.400

5510.450

5510.490

5510

5530.160

5530.200

5530.400

5530.401

5530.450

5530

7310.150

BOCES Services	*

HEALTH SERVICES - REGULAR SCHOOL	****

Instructional Salaries	*

PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES - REGULAR SCHOOL	****

Instructional Salaries	*

SOCIAL WORK SERVICES - REGULAR SCHOOL	****

Contractual & Other	*

PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES	****

Instructional Salaries	*

CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES - REGULAR SCHOOL	****

Instructional Salaries	*

Equipment	*

Contractual & Other	*

Officials	*

Materials & Supplies	*

BOCES Services	*

INTERSCHOLASTIC ACTIVITIES - REGULAR SCHOOL	****

Non-Instructional Salaries	*

Contractual & Other	*

Materials & Supplies	*

BOCES Services	*

DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES	****

Non-Instructional Salaries	*

Equipment	*

Contractual & Other	*

Utilities	*

Materials & Supplies	*

GARAGE BUILDING	****

Instructional Salaries	*

602.00

159,252.00

69,706.00

69,706.00

145,063.00

145,063.00

60,000.00

60,000.00

72,967.00

72,967.00

186,374.00

5,000.00

30,000.00

35,400.00

32,700.00

3,217.00

292,691.00

487,838.00

123,250.00

145,847.00

3,760.00

760,695.00

58,892.00

1,000.00

5,000.00

20,900.00

6,062.00

91,854.00

9,000.00

2018 - 19 Proposed Account	Description	Budget

7310.160

7310

9010.800

9010

9020.800

9020

9030.800

9030

9040.800

9040

9060.800

9060

9061.800

9061

9065.800

9065

9950.900

9950

Non-Instructional Salaries

YOUTH PROGRAMS

Employee Benefits

STATE RETIREMENT

Employee Benefits

TEACHERS' RETIREMENT

Employee Benefits

SOCIAL SECURITY

Employee Benefits

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Employee Benefits

HEALTH INSURANCE

Employee Benefits

FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT FEES

Employee Benefits

DENTAL INSURANCE

Interfund Transfer

INTERFUND TRANSFERS

*	11,745.00

****	20,745.00

*	201,388.00

****	201,388.00

*	660,134.36

****	660,134.36

*	495,452.00

****	495,452.00

*	95,112.00

****	95,112.00

*	1,950,225.00

****	1,950,225.00

*	1,214.00

****	1,214.00

*	88,399.00

****	88,399.00

*	20,500.00

****	20,500.00

Totals For Program Component:	12,750,187.36

Grand Total:	18,153,575.00

Component Percentage Analysis

Administrative Capital
Program

14.922% 14.843%
70.235%

Total:	100.000%

4/27/2018

Property Tax Report Card

2018-19 Property Tax Report Card

080201 - BAINBRIDGE-GUILFORD

Contact Person: Janice Rideout
	Budgeted

2017-18

(A)
	Proposed Budget

2018-19

(B)
	
Telephone Number: 607-967-6335

Total Budgeted Amount, not Including Separate Propositions
	
17,618,035
	
18,153,575

A. Proposed Tax Levy to Support the Total Budgeted Amount 1
	
6,174,674
	
6,435,722

B. Tax Levy to Support Library Debt, if Applicable
	
0
	
0

C. Tax Levy for Non-Excludable Propositions, if Applicable 2
	
0
	
0

D. Total Tax Cap Reserve Amount Used to Reduce Current Year Levy, if Applicable
	
0
	
0

E. Total Proposed School Year Tax Levy (A + B + C - D)
	
6,174,674
	
6,435,722

F. Permissible Exclusions to the School Tax Levy Limit
	
10,548
	
101,306

G. School Tax Levy Limit , Excluding Levy for Permissible Exclusions 3
	
6,164,126
	
6,334,416

H. Total Proposed School Year Tax Levy, Excluding Levy to Support Library Debt and/or Permissible Exclusions (E - B - F + D)
	
6,164,126
	
6,334,416

I. Difference: (G - H); (negative value requires 60.0% voter approval) 2
	
0
	
0

Public School Enrollment
	
771
	
791

Consumer Price Index
	
2.13%

1 Include any prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest.

2 Tax levy associated with educational or transportation services propositions are not eligible for exclusion under the School Tax Levy Limit and may affect voter approval requirements. 3 For 2018-19, includes any carryover from 2017-18 and excludes any tax levy for library debt or prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest.

	Actual

2017-18

(D)
	Estimated

2018-19

(E)

Adjusted Restricted Fund Balance
	
2,682,974
	
3,238,977

Assigned Appropriated Fund Balance
	
400,000
	
466,000

Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance
	
704,447
	
726,143

Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance as a Percent of the Total Budget
	
4.00%
	
4.00%

Reserve Type
	
Reserve Name
	
Reserve Description *
	
3/31/18 Actual Balance
	
6/30/18 Estimated Ending Balance
	
Intended Use of the Reserve in the 2018-2019 School Year

Capital
	
Capital Reserve Fund
	To pay the cost of any object or purpose for which bonds may be issued.
	
880,062
	
1,380,282
	
No intended use in 2018-19

Capital
	
Transportation Vehicle Capital Reserve Fund
	
To finance the purchase of school buses, vehicles and equipment.
	
-
	
-
	If voter authorized, this reserve will be established in the 2018-19 school year.

Repair
	
Repair Reserve Fund
	
To pay the cost of repairs to capital improvements or equipment.
	
-
	
-
	
No intended use in 2018-19

Workers’ Compensation
	
Workers' Compensation Reserve Fund
	
To pay for Workers Compensation and benefits.
	
153,078
	
153,117
	
No intended use in 2018-19

Unemployment Insurance
	
Unemployment Insurance Reserve Fund
	To pay the cost of reimbursement to the State Unemployment Insurance Fund.
	
39,099
	
38,996
	If unemployment insurance claims are incurred during the 2018-19 school year, the district will use the reserve to offset the expenditure.

Reserve for Tax Reduction
	
N/A
	For the gradual use of the proceeds of the sale of school district real property.
	
-
	
-
	
N/A

Mandatory Reserve for Debt Service
	
N/A
	To cover debt service payments on outstanding obligations (bonds, BANS) after the sale of district capital assets or improvements.
	
-
	
-
	
N/A

Insurance
	
N/A
	
To pay liability, casualty, and other types of uninsured losses.
	
-
	
-
	
N/A

Property Loss
	
Property Loss Reserve Fund
	
To establish and maintain a program of reserves to cover property loss.
	
132,413
	
132,446
	District is asking voters to liquidate this reserve to the General Fund. If authorized, district intends to transfer funds in 2018-19 to a newly created Transportation Vehicle Capital Reserve (if authorized for creation).

Liability
	
Liability Reserve Fund
	
To establish and maintain a program of reserves to cover liability claims incurred.
	
171,044
	
171,087
	District is asking voters to liquidate this reserve to the General Fund. If authorized, district intends to transfer funds in 2018-19 to a newly created Transportation Vehicle Capital Reserve (if authorized for
creation).

Tax Certiorari
	
Tax Certiorari Reserve Fund
	
To establish a reserve fund for tax certiorari settlements
	
90,095
	
90,118
	District has a pending claim. If a settlement is reached in 2018-19, the district will use reserve funds pay the claim.

Reserve for Insurance Recoveries
	
N/A
	To account for unexpended proceeds of insurance recoveries at the fiscal year end.
	
-
	
-
	
N/A

Employee Benefit Accrued Liability
	Employee Benefit Accrued Liability Reserve Fund
	For the payment of accrued ‘employee benefits’ due to employees upon termination of service.
	
456,348
	
456,462
	District has appropriated $60,131 from this reserve for the 2018-19 budget for a leave based retirement incentive that will be earned
during the 2018-19 school year.

Retirement Contribution
	
Retirement Contribution Reserve Fund
	To fund employer retirement contributions to the State and Local Employees’ Retirement System
	
750,420
	
750,608
	
No intended use in 2018-19

Reserve for Uncollected Taxes
	
N/A
	For unpaid taxes due certain city school districts not reimbursed by their city/county until the following fiscal year.
	
-
	
-
	
N/A

Other Reserve
	
N/A
	
N/A
	
-
	
-
	
N/A

Schedule of Reserve Funds

School Academic Report Card

BAINBRIDGE-GUILFORDCSD-SCHOOLREPORTCARDDATA[2016-17]

BAINBRIDGE-GUILFORD CSD ENROLLMENT(2016 -17)

K-12ENROLLMENT

MALE

781

ENROLLMENTBYGENDER

FEMALE

404
	52%
	377
	48%

ENROLLMENTBYETHNICITY

GROUP	TOTAL	PERCENT

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN

HISPANICORLATINO

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFICISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL
	2	0%

6	1%
	
	20	3%

7	1%
	
	721	92%
	
	25	3%

OTHERGROUPS

ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

—
	—
	101
	13%
	357
	46%

ENROLLMENTBYGRADE

GROUP	TOTAL	PERCENT

PRE-K(FULLDAY)

K(FULLDAY)

1STGRADE

2NDGRADE

3RDGRADE

4THGRADE

5THGRADE

6THGRADE

UNGRADEDELEMENTARY

7THGRADE

8THGRADE

9THGRADE

10THGRADE

11THGRADE

12THGRADE

UNGRADEDSECONDARY
	36	4%
	
	53	6%
	
	51	6%
	
	56	7%
	
	59	7%

66	8%
	
	52	6%
	
	61	7%

7	1%

49	6%

63	8%

53	6%
	
	75	9%
	
	54	7%
	
	74	9%
	
	8	1%

1 of 42

FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2016 -17) ELIGIBLEFORFREELUNCH	ELIGIBLEFORREDUCED-PRICELUNCH

232
	30%
	49
	6%

ATTENDANCE (2015 -16)
	
ANNUALATTENDANCERATE
	94%

STUDENTSUSPENSIONS(2015 -16)

38
	5%

2 of 42

STAFFCOUNTS(2016 -17)

GROUP	STAFF

PRINCIPALS

ASSISTANTPRINCIPALS

OTHERPROFESSIONALSTAFF

PARAPROFESSIONALS
	3

0
	
	14

38

3 of 42

HIGHSCHOOLCOMPLETERS(2016-17)
GROUP	COMPLETERS(GRADUATES+ COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)	GRADUATES(REGENTS+ LOCALDIPLOMAS)	REGENTSDIPLOMA
	
ALLSTUDENTS	72	71	57	80%

GENERALEDUCATION	60	60	55	92%

STUDENTSWITH DISABILITIES	12	11	2	18%

GROUP	REGENTSWITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION	REGENTSWITH CTE ENDORSEMENT	LOCALDIPLOMAS	COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
	
ALLSTUDENTS	21	30%	15	21%	14	20%	1	1%

GENERALEDUCATION	21	35%	14	23%	5	8%	0	0%

STUDENTSWITH DISABILITIES	0	0%	1	9%	9	82%	1	8%

4 of 42

HIGHSCHOOLNON-COMPLETERS(2016-17)

GROUP	DROPPED OUT	ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOLEQUIVALENCYPREPARATION	TOTALNONCOMPLETERS PROGRAM

ALLSTUDENTS	_	_	_	_	_	_

GENERALEDUCATION	_	_	_	_	_	_

5 of 42

POST-GRADUATIONPLANSOFCOMPLETERS(2016-17)

GROUP	TO FOUR-YEARCOLLEGE	TO TWO-YEARCOLLEGE	TO OTHERPOST-SECONDARY	TO THE MILITARY
	
ALLSTUDENTS	20	28%	20	28%	2	3%	4	6%

GENERALEDUCATION	20	33%	18	30%	1	2%	4	7%

STUDENTSWITH DISABILITIES	0	0%	2	17%	1	8%	0	0%

GROUP	TO EMPLOYMENT	TO ADULT SERVICES	TO OTHERKNOWN PLANS	PLANSUNKNOWN
	
ALLSTUDENTS	26	36%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%

GENERALEDUCATION	17	28%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%
	
STUDENTSWITH DISABILITIES	9	75%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%

6 of 42

GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

50.0

37.5

25.0

12.5

0.0	1	2	3	4

District: 2017

Statewide: 2017

3-4

MEANSCORE:305

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	54

GENERALEDUCATION	46

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	8

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	3

WHITE	48

MULTIRACIAL	1

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	6

FEMALE	27

MALE	27

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	54

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	26

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	28

NOTMIGRANT	54

35%	16	30%	19	35%	19	35%	0	0%

41%	12	26%	15	33%	19	41%	0	0%

0%	4	50%	4	50%	0	0%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

33%	14	29%	18	38%	16	33%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

50%	2	33%	1	17%	3	50%	0	0%

44%	7	26%	8	30%	12	44%	0	0%

26%	9	33%	11	41%	7	26%	0	0%

35%	16	30%	19	35%	19	35%	0	0%

31%	8	31%	10	38%	8	31%	0	0%

39%	8	29%	9	32%	11	39%	0	0%

35%	16	30%	19	35%	19	35%	0	0%

7 of 42

GRADE 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

60

45

30

15

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2017

Statewide:

2017

MEANSCORE:299

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	64

GENERALEDUCATION	58

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	6

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	2

WHITE	58

MULTIRACIAL	3

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	6

FEMALE	33

MALE	31

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	64

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	36

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	28

NOTMIGRANT	64

22%	17	27%	33	52%	10	16%	4	6%

22%	16	28%	29	50%	9	16%	4	7%

17%	1	17%	4	67%	1	17%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

22%	17	29%	28	48%	9	16%	4	7%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

17%	0	0%	5	83%	1	17%	0	0%

21%	6	18%	20	61%	7	21%	0	0%

23%	11	35%	13	42%	3	10%	4	13%

22%	17	27%	33	52%	10	16%	4	6%

19%	10	28%	19	53%	5	14%	2	6%

25%	7	25%	14	50%	5	18%	2	7%

22%	17	27%	33	52%	10	16%	4	6%

8 of 42

GRADE 5 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

40

30

20

10

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2017

Statewide:

2017

MEANSCORE:295

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	39

GENERALEDUCATION	31

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	8

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	1

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	2

HISPANICORLATINO	1

WHITE	34

MULTIRACIAL	1

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	21

MALE	18

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	38

ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	1

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	22

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	17

NOTMIGRANT	39

26%	15	38%	14	36%	5	13%	5	13%

32%	11	35%	10	32%	5	16%	5	16%

0%	4	50%	4	50%	0	0%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

26%	13	38%	12	35%	4	12%	5	15%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

20%	2	40%	2	40%	1	20%	0	0%

33%	6	29%	8	38%	2	10%	5	24%

17%	9	50%	6	33%	3	17%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

5%	9	41%	12	55%	1	5%	0	0%

53%	6	35%	2	12%	4	24%	5	29%

26%	15	38%	14	36%	5	13%	5	13%

9 of 42

GRADE 6 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

80

60

40

20

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2017

Statewide:

2017

MEANSCORE:298

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	50

GENERALEDUCATION	46

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	4

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	3

WHITE	45

MULTIRACIAL	1

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	24

MALE	26

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	50

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	26

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	24

NOTMIGRANT	50

18%	10	20%	31	62%	6	12%	3	6%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

16%	9	20%	29	64%	5	11%	2	4%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

40%	1	20%	2	40%	1	20%	1	20%

29%	4	17%	13	54%	4	17%	3	13%

8%	6	23%	18	69%	2	8%	0	0%

18%	10	20%	31	62%	6	12%	3	6%

19%	7	27%	14	54%	4	15%	1	4%

17%	3	13%	17	71%	2	8%	2	8%

18%	10	20%	31	62%	6	12%	3	6%

10 of 42

GRADE 7 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

50.0

37.5

25.0

12.5

0.0	1	2	3	4

District: 2017

Statewide: 2017

3-4

MEANSCORE:298

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	34

GENERALEDUCATION	28

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	6

HISPANICORLATINO	1

WHITE	33

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	34

FEMALE	12

MALE	22

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	33

ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	1

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	16

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	18

NOTMIGRANT	34

38%	12	35%	9

46%	6	21%	9

0%	6	100%	0

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

38%	12	35%	9

50%	3	25%	3

32%	9	41%	6

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

19%	7	44%	6

56%	5	28%	3

38%	12	35%	9

26%	10	29%	3	9%

32%	10	36%	3	11%

0%	0	0%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

26%	10	29%	3	9%

25%	5	42%	1	8%

27%	5	23%	2	9%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

38%	1	6%	2	13%

17%	9	50%	1	6%

26%	10	29%	3	9%

11 of 42

GRADE 8 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

60

45

30

15

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2017

Statewide:

2017

MEANSCORE:305

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	38

GENERALEDUCATION	33

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	5

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	2

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	1

WHITE	33

MULTIRACIAL	1

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	22

MALE	16

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	37

ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	1

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	16

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	22

NOTMIGRANT	38

34%	8	21%	17	45%	9	24%	4	11%

39%	4	12%	16	48%	9	27%	4	12%

0%	4	80%	1	20%	0	0%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

36%	7	21%	14	42%	9	27%	3	9%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

20%	1	20%	3	60%	0	0%	1	20%

36%	5	23%	9	41%	5	23%	3	14%

31%	3	19%	8	50%	4	25%	1	6%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

25%	5	31%	7	44%	1	6%	3	19%

41%	3	14%	10	45%	8	36%	1	5%

34%	8	21%	17	45%	9	24%	4	11%

12 of 42

GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS

60

45

30

15

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2017

Statewide:

2017

MEANSCORE:307

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	53

GENERALEDUCATION	45

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	8

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	3

WHITE	47

MULTIRACIAL	1

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	6

FEMALE	26

MALE	27

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	53

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	26

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	27

NOTMIGRANT	53

45%	10	19%	19	36%	16	30%	8	15%

51%	4	9%	18	40%	15	33%	8	18%

13%	6	75%	1	13%	1	13%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

45%	8	17%	18	38%	14	30%	7	15%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

50%	2	33%	1	17%	2	33%	1	17%

50%	3	12%	10	38%	8	31%	5	19%

41%	7	26%	9	33%	8	30%	3	11%

45%	10	19%	19	36%	16	30%	8	15%

42%	6	23%	9	35%	8	31%	3	12%

48%	4	15%	10	37%	8	30%	5	19%

45%	10	19%	19	36%	16	30%	8	15%

13 of 42

GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS

60

45

30

15

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2017

Statewide:

2017

MEANSCORE:285

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	61

GENERALEDUCATION	56

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	5

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	2

WHITE	55

MULTIRACIAL	3

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	6

FEMALE	30

MALE	31

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	61

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	35

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	26

NOTMIGRANT	61

13%	21	34%	32	52%	6	10%	2	3%

14%	17	30%	31	55%	6	11%	2	4%

0%	4	80%	1	20%	0	0%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

13%	19	35%	29	53%	5	9%	2	4%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

17%	2	33%	3	50%	1	17%	0	0%

3%	14	47%	15	50%	0	0%	1	3%

23%	7	23%	17	55%	6	19%	1	3%

13%	21	34%	32	52%	6	10%	2	3%

9%	12	34%	20	57%	3	9%	0	0%

19%	9	35%	12	46%	3	12%	2	8%

13%	21	34%	32	52%	6	10%	2	3%

14 of 42

GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS

50.0

37.5

25.0

12.5

0.0	1	2	3	4

District: 2017

Statewide: 2017

3-4

MEANSCORE:303

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	38

GENERALEDUCATION	31

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	7

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	1

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	2

HISPANICORLATINO	1

WHITE	33

MULTIRACIAL	1

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	21

MALE	17

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	37

ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	1

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	22

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	16

NOTMIGRANT	38

34%	16	42%	9

39%	12	39%	7

14%	4	57%	2

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

30%	14	42%	9

_%	_	_	_

60%	2	40%	0

38%	10	48%	3

29%	6	35%	6

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

18%	11	50%	7

56%	5	31%	2

34%	16	42%	9

24%	10	26%	3	8%

23%	9	29%	3	10%

29%	1	14%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

27%	7	21%	3	9%

_	_	_	_	_

0%	3	60%	0	0%

14%	6	29%	2	10%

35%	4	24%	1	6%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

32%	4	18%	0	0%

13%	6	38%	3	19%

24%	10	26%	3	8%

15 of 42

GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS

60

45

30

15

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2017

Statewide:

2017

MEANSCORE:289

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	48

GENERALEDUCATION	45

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	3

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	3

WHITE	43

MULTIRACIAL	1

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	24

MALE	24

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	48

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	25

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	23

NOTMIGRANT	48

17%	23	48%	17	35%	5	10%	3	6%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

14%	20	47%	17	40%	4	9%	2	5%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

40%	3	60%	0	0%	1	20%	1	20%

17%	13	54%	7	29%	4	17%	0	0%

17%	10	42%	10	42%	1	4%	3	13%

17%	23	48%	17	35%	5	10%	3	6%

4%	14	56%	10	40%	1	4%	0	0%

30%	9	39%	7	30%	4	17%	3	13%

17%	23	48%	17	35%	5	10%	3	6%

16 of 42

GRADE 7 MATHEMATICS

Mean scoresand datain thetablefor grade7math includeonlythosefor grade7studentswho tooktheGrade7New YorkStateTestingProgram Assessment(NYSTP)in Mathematics. For 2015and forward, datain thebar chartsincludethosefor grade7studentswho tooktheGrade7NYSTP in Mathematicsand grade7studentswho tookaRegentsmath testin lieu of theNYSTP. For 2014and earlier, datain thebar chartsincludeonlythosefor grade7studentswho tooktheGrade7NYSTP.

60

45

30

15

0	1	2	3	4 & above

District: 2017

Statewide: 2017

3 & above

MEANSCORE:291

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	26

GENERALEDUCATION	21

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	5

HISPANICORLATINO	1

WHITE	25

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	26

FEMALE	10

MALE	16

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	26

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	11

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	15

NOTMIGRANT	26

15%	10	38%	12	46%	4	15%	0	0%

19%	5	24%	12	57%	4	19%	0	0%

0%	5	100%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

15%	10	38%	12	46%	4	15%	0	0%

10%	2	20%	7	70%	1	10%	0	0%

19%	8	50%	5	31%	3	19%	0	0%

15%	10	38%	12	46%	4	15%	0	0%

0%	5	45%	6	55%	0	0%	0	0%

27%	5	33%	6	40%	4	27%	0	0%

15%	10	38%	12	46%	4	15%	0	0%

17 of 42

GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS

Mean scoresand datain thetablefor grade8math includeonlythosefor grade8studentswho tooktheGrade8New YorkStateTestingProgram Assessment(NYSTP)in Mathematics. For 2015and forward, datain thebar chartsincludethosefor grade8studentswho tooktheGrade8NYSTP in Mathematicsand grade8studentswho tookaRegentsmath testin lieu of theNYSTP. For 2014and earlier, datain thebar chartsincludeonlythosefor grade8studentswho tooktheGrade8NYSTP.

50.0

37.5

25.0

12.5

0.0	1	2	3	4 & above

District: 2017

Statewide: 2017

3 & above

MEANSCORE:299

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	35

GENERALEDUCATION	31

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	4

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	2

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	1

WHITE	30

MULTIRACIAL	1

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	20

MALE	15

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	34

ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	1

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	15

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	20

NOTMIGRANT	35

26%	11	31%	15	43%	8	23%	1	3%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

23%	9	30%	14	47%	6	20%	1	3%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

40%	2	40%	1	20%	2	40%	0	0%

30%	6	30%	8	40%	5	25%	1	5%

20%	5	33%	7	47%	3	20%	0	0%

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

20%	7	47%	5	33%	2	13%	1	7%

30%	4	20%	10	50%	6	30%	0	0%

26%	11	31%	15	43%	8	23%	1	3%

18 of 42

GRADE 4 SCIENCE

100

75

50

25

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2017

Statewide:

2017

MEANSCORE:88

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	69

GENERALEDUCATION	63

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	6

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	2

WHITE	62

MULTIRACIAL	4

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	7

FEMALE	33

MALE	36

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	69

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	39

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	30

NOTMIGRANT	69

100%	0	0%	0

100%	0	0%	0

100%	0	0%	0

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

100%	0	0%	0

_%	_	_	_

100%	0	0%	0

100%	0	0%	0

100%	0	0%	0

100%	0	0%	0

100%	0	0%	0

100%	0	0%	0

100%	0	0%	0

0%	20	29%	49	71%

0%	16	25%	47	75%

0%	4	67%	2	33%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

0%	18	29%	44	71%

_	_	_	_	_

0%	2	29%	5	71%

0%	12	36%	21	64%

0%	8	22%	28	78%

0%	20	29%	49	71%

0%	13	33%	26	67%

0%	7	23%	23	77%

0%	20	29%	49	71%

19 of 42

GRADE 8 SCIENCE

Datain thebar chartsincludethosefor grade8studentswho tooktheNew YorkStateGrade8ScienceTestand grade8studentswho tookaRegentssciencetestin lieu of thistest. Mean scoresand datain thetablefor grade8scienceincludeonlythosefor grade8studentswho tooktheNew YorkStateGrade8ScienceTest.

100

75

50

25

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2017

Statewide:

2017

MEANSCORE:72

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	43

GENERALEDUCATION	38

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	5

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	2

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

HISPANICORLATINO	1

WHITE	36

MULTIRACIAL	3

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	7

FEMALE	22

MALE	21

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	42

ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	1

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	20

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	23

NOTMIGRANT	43

77%	1	2%	9

84%	1	3%	5

20%	0	0%	4

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

81%	0	0%	7

_%	_	_	_

57%	1	14%	2

82%	0	0%	4

71%	1	5%	5

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

65%	1	5%	6

87%	0	0%	3

77%	1	2%	9

21%	29	67%	4	9%

13%	28	74%	4	11%

80%	1	20%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

19%	25	69%	4	11%

_	_	_	_	_

29%	4	57%	0	0%

18%	15	68%	3	14%

24%	14	67%	1	5%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

30%	11	55%	2	10%

13%	18	78%	2	9%

21%	29	67%	4	9%

20 of 42

TOTALCOHORTRESULTSIN SECONDARY-LEVELENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTSAFTERFOURYEARSOFINSTRUCTION

100

75

50

25

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2013 Cohort

Statewide: 2013
Cohort

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	70

GENERALEDUCATION	60

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	10

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	2

HISPANICORLATINO	2

WHITE	65

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	32

MALE	38

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	70

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	25

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	45

NOTMIGRANT	70

93%	0	0%

100%	0	0%

50%	0	0%

_%	_	_

_%	_	_

_%	_	_

92%	0	0%

100%	0	0%

97%	0	0%

89%	0	0%

93%	0	0%

96%	0	0%

91%	0	0%

93%	0	0%

5	7%	13	19%	52	74%

0	0%	10	17%	50	83%

5	50%	3	30%	2	20%

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

5	8%	13	20%	47	72%

0	0%	0	0%	5	100%

1	3%	4	13%	27	84%

4	11%	9	24%	25	66%

5	7%	13	19%	52	74%

1	4%	7	28%	17	68%

4	9%	6	13%	35	78%

5	7%	13	19%	52	74%

21 of 42

TOTALCOHORTRESULTSIN SECONDARY-LEVELMATHEMATICSAFTER FOURYEARSOFINSTRUCTION

100

75

50

25

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2013 Cohort

Statewide: 2013
Cohort

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	70

GENERALEDUCATION	60

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	10

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	2

HISPANICORLATINO	2

WHITE	65

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	32

MALE	38

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	70

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	25

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	45

NOTMIGRANT	70

86%	1	1%	9

92%	0	0%	5

50%	1	10%	4

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

85%	1	2%	9

100%	0	0%	0

88%	0	0%	4

84%	1	3%	5

86%	1	1%	9

80%	1	4%	4

89%	0	0%	5

86%	1	1%	9

13%	42	60%	18	26%

8%	37	62%	18	30%

40%	5	50%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

14%	40	62%	15	23%

0%	2	40%	3	60%

13%	21	66%	7	22%

13%	21	55%	11	29%

13%	42	60%	18	26%

16%	16	64%	4	16%

11%	26	58%	14	31%

13%	42	60%	18	26%

22 of 42

TOTALCOHORTRESULTSIN SECONDARY-LEVELGLOBALHISTORYAND GEOGRAPHYAFTERFOURYEARSOFINSTRUCTION

100

75

50

25

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2013 Cohort

Statewide: 2013
Cohort

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	70

GENERALEDUCATION	60

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	10

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	2

HISPANICORLATINO	2

WHITE	65

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	32

MALE	38

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	70

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	25

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	45

NOTMIGRANT	70

83%	1	1%	9

90%	0	0%	4

40%	1	10%	5

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

82%	1	2%	9

100%	0	0%	0

84%	0	0%	3

82%	1	3%	6

83%	1	1%	9

84%	0	0%	4

82%	1	2%	5

83%	1	1%	9

13%	41	59%	17	24%

7%	37	62%	17	28%

50%	4	40%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

14%	38	58%	15	23%

0%	3	60%	2	40%

9%	19	59%	8	25%

16%	22	58%	9	24%

13%	41	59%	17	24%

16%	17	68%	4	16%

11%	24	53%	13	29%

13%	41	59%	17	24%

23 of 42

TOTALCOHORTRESULTSIN SECONDARY-LEVELU.S.HISTORYAND GOVERNMENTAFTERFOURYEARSOFINSTRUCTION

100

75

50

25

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2013 Cohort

Statewide: 2013
Cohort

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	70

GENERALEDUCATION	60

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	10

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	2

HISPANICORLATINO	2

WHITE	65

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	32

MALE	38

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	70

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	25

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	45

NOTMIGRANT	70

83%	2	3%	6

87%	1	2%	3

60%	1	10%	3

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

_%	_	_	_

82%	2	3%	6

100%	0	0%	0

81%	2	6%	3

84%	0	0%	3

83%	2	3%	6

72%	0	0%	3

89%	2	4%	3

83%	2	3%	6

9%	28	40%	30	43%

5%	24	40%	28	47%

30%	4	40%	2	20%

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_

9%	27	42%	26	40%

0%	1	20%	4	80%

9%	12	38%	14	44%

8%	16	42%	16	42%

9%	28	40%	30	43%

12%	10	40%	8	32%

7%	18	40%	22	49%

9%	28	40%	30	43%

24 of 42

TOTALCOHORTRESULTSIN SECONDARY-LEVELSCIENCE AFTERFOUR YEARSOFINSTRUCTION

100

75

50

25

0	1	2	3	4	3-4

District: 2013 Cohort

Statewide: 2013
Cohort

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

ALLSTUDENTS	70

GENERALEDUCATION	60

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	10

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	2

HISPANICORLATINO	2

WHITE	65

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	5

FEMALE	32

MALE	38

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	70

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	25

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	45

NOTMIGRANT	70

91%	0	0%

97%	0	0%

60%	0	0%

_%	_	_

_%	_	_

_%	_	_

91%	0	0%

100%	0	0%

94%	0	0%

89%	0	0%

91%	0	0%

88%	0	0%

93%	0	0%

91%	0	0%

6	9%	42	60%	22	31%

2	3%	36	60%	22	37%

4	40%	6	60%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

6	9%	40	62%	19	29%

0	0%	2	40%	3	60%

2	6%	20	63%	10	31%

4	11%	22	58%	12	32%

6	9%	42	60%	22	31%

3	12%	18	72%	4	16%

3	7%	24	53%	18	40%

6	9%	42	60%	22	31%

25 of 42

RegentsExaminationResults(2016-17)

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS(COMMON CORE)

ENGLISHLANGUAGEARTS(COMMONCORE)

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4	LEVEL5

ALLSTUDENTS
	58

54

4

3

53

2

5

26

32

58

19

39

58
	1	2%	2	3%	10	17%	10	17%	35	60%

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

1	2%	1	2%	9	17%	9	17%	33	62%

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

0	0%	1	20%	1	20%	1	20%	2	40%

0	0%	1	4%	3	12%	3	12%	19	73%

1	3%	1	3%	7	22%	7	22%	16	50%

1	2%	2	3%	10	17%	10	17%	35	60%

1	5%	2	11%	5	26%	1	5%	10	53%

0	0%	0	0%	5	13%	9	23%	25	64%

1	2%	2	3%	10	17%	10	17%	35	60%
	
GENERALEDUCATION

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES
			
HISPANICORLATINO

WHITE
			
MULTIRACIAL

SMALLGROUP TOTAL
			
FEMALE

MALE
			
NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTMIGRANT

ALGEBRAI(COMMON CORE)

ALGEBRAI(COMMONCORE)

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4	LEVEL5

ALLSTUDENTS

GENERALEDUCATION

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALLGROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTMIGRANT

38	0	0%	3	8%	26	68%	8	21%	1	3%

30	0	0%	2	7%	19	63%	8	27%	1	3%

8	0	0%	1	13%	7	88%	0	0%	0	0%

37	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

1	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

38	0	0%	3	8%	26	68%	8	21%	1	3%

23	0	0%	2	9%	18	78%	3	13%	0	0%

15	0	0%	1	7%	8	53%	5	33%	1	7%

38	0	0%	3	8%	26	68%	8	21%	1	3%

14	0	0%	1	7%	10	71%	3	21%	0	0%

24	0	0%	2	8%	16	67%	5	21%	1	4%

38	0	0%	3	8%	26	68%	8	21%	1	3%

26 of 42

COMMON CORE GEOMETRY

REGENTSCOMMONCOREGEOMETRY

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4	LEVEL5

ALLSTUDENTS

GENERALEDUCATION

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALLGROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTMIGRANT
	61

60

1

1

1

57

2

61

37

24

61

16

45

61
	0	0%	1	2%	33	54%	12	20%	15	25%

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_

0	0%	1	2%	33	54%	12	20%	15	25%

0	0%	0	0%	23	62%	5	14%	9	24%

0	0%	1	4%	10	42%	7	29%	6	25%

0	0%	1	2%	33	54%	12	20%	15	25%

0	0%	0	0%	11	69%	4	25%	1	6%

0	0%	1	2%	22	49%	8	18%	14	31%

0	0%	1	2%	33	54%	12	20%	15	25%

ALGEBRAII(COMMON CORE)

ALGEBRAII(COMMONCORE)

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4	LEVEL5

ALLSTUDENTS

GENERALEDUCATION

WHITE

FEMALE

MALE

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTMIGRANT

13	0	0%	0	0%

13	0	0%	0	0%

13	0	0%	0	0%

8	0	0%	0	0%

5	0	0%	0	0%

13	0	0%	0	0%

13	0	0%	0	0%

13	0	0%	0	0%

2	15%	9	69%	2	15%

2	15%	9	69%	2	15%

2	15%	9	69%	2	15%

1	13%	6	75%	1	13%

1	20%	3	60%	1	20%

2	15%	9	69%	2	15%

2	15%	9	69%	2	15%

2	15%	9	69%	2	15%

27 of 42

GLOBALHISTORYAND GEOGRAPHY

REGENTSGLOBALHISTORYANDGEOGRAPHY

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	55	65	85

ALLSTUDENTS

GENERALEDUCATION

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN

HISPANICORLATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALLGROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTMIGRANT
	80

70

10

1

3

73

3

7

47

33

80

30

50

80
	76	95%	71	89%	38	48%

68	97%	65	93%	37	53%

8	80%	6	60%	1	10%

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

70	96%	67	92%	35	48%

_	_	_	_	_	_

6	86%	4	57%	3	43%

44	94%	43	91%	19	40%

32	97%	28	85%	19	58%

76	95%	71	89%	38	48%

27	90%	23	77%	12	40%

49	98%	48	96%	26	52%

76	95%	71	89%	38	48%

U.S.HISTORY&GOVERNMENT

REGENTSU.S.HISTORY&GOVERNMENT

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	55	65	85

ALLSTUDENTS	51

GENERALEDUCATION	46

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	5

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

HISPANICORLATINO	3

WHITE	45

MULTIRACIAL	2

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	6

FEMALE	26

MALE	25

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	51

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	19

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	32

NOTMIGRANT	51

50	98%	49	96%	28	55%

45	98%	45	98%	28	61%

5	100%	4	80%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

44	98%	43	96%	26	58%

_	_	_	_	_	_

6	100%	6	100%	2	33%

26	100%	26	100%	15	58%

24	96%	23	92%	13	52%

50	98%	49	96%	28	55%

18	95%	17	89%	6	32%

32	100%	32	100%	22	69%

50	98%	49	96%	28	55%

28 of 42

LIVINGENVIRONMENT

REGENTSLIVINGENVIRONMENT

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	55	65	85

ALLSTUDENTS

GENERALEDUCATION

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN

HISPANICORLATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALLGROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTMIGRANT
	62

54

8

1

1

58

2

62

34

28

62

20

42

62
	58	94%	51	82%	21	34%

51	94%	46	85%	21	39%

7	88%	5	63%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

58	94%	51	82%	21	34%

33	97%	30	88%	9	26%

25	89%	21	75%	12	43%

58	94%	51	82%	21	34%

19	95%	17	85%	3	15%

39	93%	34	81%	18	43%

58	94%	51	82%	21	34%

PHYSICALSETTING/EARTH SCIENCE

REGENTSPHYSICALSETTING/EARTHSCIENCE

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	55	65	85

ALLSTUDENTS	68

GENERALEDUCATION	60

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	8

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

WHITE	67

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	68

FEMALE	44

MALE	24

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	68

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	22

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	46

NOTMIGRANT	68

66	97%	56	82%	20	29%

58	97%	50	83%	19	32%

8	100%	6	75%	1	13%

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

66	97%	56	82%	20	29%

42	95%	34	77%	11	25%

24	100%	22	92%	9	38%

66	97%	56	82%	20	29%

20	91%	18	82%	6	27%

46	100%	38	83%	14	30%

66	97%	56	82%	20	29%

29 of 42

PHYSICALSETTING/CHEMISTRY

REGENTSPHYSICALSETTING/CHEMISTRY

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	55	65	85

ALLSTUDENTS

GENERALEDUCATION

WHITE

FEMALE

MALE

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

NOTMIGRANT
	5

5

5

3

2

5

3

2

5
	4	80%	3	60%	0	0%

4	80%	3	60%	0	0%

4	80%	3	60%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

4	80%	3	60%	0	0%

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

4	80%	3	60%	0	0%

PHYSICALSETTING/PHYSICS

REGENTSPHYSICALSETTING/PHYSICS

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	55	65	85

ALLSTUDENTS	29

GENERALEDUCATION	29

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	1

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	1

WHITE	26

MULTIRACIAL	1

SMALLGROUP TOTAL	29

FEMALE	13

MALE	16

NON-ENGLISHLANGUAGELEARNERS	29

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	6

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	23

NOTMIGRANT	29

29	100%	29	100%	10	34%

29	100%	29	100%	10	34%

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

_	_	_	_	_	_

29	100%	29	100%	10	34%

13	100%	13	100%	2	15%

16	100%	16	100%	8	50%

29	100%	29	100%	10	34%

6	100%	6	100%	2	33%

23	100%	23	100%	8	35%

29	100%	29	100%	10	34%

30 of 42

NEWYORKSTATEALTERNATEASSESSMENT(NYSAA)RESULTS(2016-17)

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	PROFICIENT	LEVEL1	LEVEL2	LEVEL3	LEVEL4

GRADE3ELA

GRADE3MATH

GRADE4ELA

GRADE4MATH

GRADE4SCIENCE

GRADE6ELA

GRADE6MATH

GRADE7ELA

GRADE7MATH

GRADE8ELA

GRADE8MATH

GRADE8SCIENCE

SECONDARY-LEVELELA

SECONDARY-LEVELMATH

SECONDARY-LEVELSCIENCE

SECONDARY-LEVELSOCIALSTUDIES

1	_%	_	_	_	_

1	_%	_	_	_	_

2	_%	_	_	_	_

2	_%	_	_	_	_

3	_%	_	_	_	_

1	_%	_	_	_	_

1	_%	_	_	_	_

2	_%	_	_	_	_

2	_%	_	_	_	_

2	_%	_	_	_	_

2	_%	_	_	_	_

2	_%	_	_	_	_

1	_%	_	_	_	_

1	_%	_	_	_	_

1	_%	_	_	_	_

1	_%	_	_	_	_

31 of 42

NEWYORKSTATEENGLISHASASECONDLANGUAGEACHIEVEMENTTEST(NYSESLAT)RESULTS(2016-17)

GRADE 5

GROUP
	
TOTALTESTED	ENTERING	EMERGING	TRANSITIONING	EXPANDING	COMMANDING

ALLSTUDENTS

GENERALEDUCATION
	1	_	_	_	_	_

1	_	_	_	_	_

32 of 42

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVELENGLISHLANGUAGEARTSRESULTSFORACCOUNTABILITY

ALLACCOUNTABILITYGROUPSMADE AYP: NO

GROUP
	MADE AYP	TESTED 95%		STUDENTS	PERCENT OF        PI>= EAMO ORSAFE TESTED STUDENTS	PI	EAMO ENROLLED DURING          ENROLLED	HARBORTARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS
THE TEST	STUDENTSWITH	DAY ADMINISTRATION VALID TEST SCORES
PERIOD

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET

ALLSTUDENTS	NO

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	―

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	―

HISPANICORLATINO	―

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	―

WHITE	NO

MULTIRACIAL	―

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	NO

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENT	―

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	NO

NO	725*	79%*	YES	276	101	104	97

―	2	―	―	2	―	―	―

―	4	―	―	2	―	―	―

―	14	―	―	11	―	―	―

―	5	―	―	5	―	―	―

NO	659*	79%*	YES	249	101	117	96

―	11	―	―	7	―	―	―

NO	112*	75%*	NO	43✝	60✝	70	70

―	3	―	―	3	―	―	―

NO	410*	77%*	YES	145	88	93	86

RESULTSFORTHE FOLLOWINGGROUPSARE NOTUSED TO DETERMINE AYP.

GROUP
	STUDENTSENROLLED DURINGTHE TEST	PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTSWITH       TESTED STUDENTSENROLLED ON BEDSDAY	PI ADMINISTRATION PERIOD                                           VALID TEST SCORES

NOTAMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	721*	79%*	274	102

NOTBLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	719*	78%*	274	101

NOTHISPANICORLATINO	700*	79%*	265	102

NOTASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPAC…	716*	78%*	271	101

NOTWHITE	36	―	27	―

NOTMULTIRACIAL	703*	79%*	269	101

GENERALEDUCATION	613*	79%*	236	109

ENGLISHPROFICIENT	719*	78%*	273	101

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	315*	81%*	131	116

MALE	400*	75%*	141	89

FEMALE	325*	83%*	135	114

MIGRANT	0	―	0	―

NOTMIGRANT	725*	79%*	276	101

―Therewerefewerthan40studentsenrolledduringthetestadministrationperiod,sothePercentofEnrolledStudentswithValidTestScoresdataaresuppressedORtherewerefewerthan30testedstudentsenrolled onBEDSdayandduringthetestadministrationperiod,sothePI,EAMO,andSafeHarborTargetdataaresuppressed. *Thepercentageofstudentstestedinthecurrentyearfellbelow95percent,sothenumbersofenrolledandtestedstudentsinthecurrentyearandpreviousyearwerecombinedtoprovidetheschool/districtwith anotheropportunitytomeettheparticipationratecriterion.
✝Includesformerstudentswithdisabilitiesbecausethenumberofstudentswithdisabilitiesinthecurrentyearisequaltoorgreaterthan30.

33 of 42

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVELMATHEMATICSRESULTSFORACCOUNTABILITY

ALLACCOUNTABILITYGROUPSMADE AYP: NO

GROUP
	MADE AYP	TESTED 95%		STUDENTS	PERCENT OF        PI>= EAMO ORSAFE TESTED STUDENTS	PI	EAMO ENROLLED DURING          ENROLLED	HARBORTARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS
THE TEST	STUDENTSWITH	DAY ADMINISTRATION VALID TEST SCORES
PERIOD

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET

ALLSTUDENTS	NO

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	―

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	―

HISPANICORLATINO	―

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	―

WHITE	NO

MULTIRACIAL	―

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	NO

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENT	―

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	NO

NO	726*	72%*	NO

―	2	―	―

―	5	―	―

―	14	―	―

―	5	―	―

NO	659*	72%*	NO

―	12	―	―

NO	112*	68%*	NO

―	3	―	―

NO	411*	70%*	NO

259	93	102	102

2	―	―	―

2	―	―	―

11	―	―	―

5	―	―	―

232	92	114	105

7	―	―	―

38✝	58✝	70	70

2	―	―	―

137	77	91	87

RESULTSFORTHE FOLLOWINGGROUPSARE NOTUSED TO DETERMINE AYP.

GROUP
	STUDENTSENROLLED DURINGTHE TEST	PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTSWITH       TESTED STUDENTSENROLLED ON BEDSDAY	PI ADMINISTRATION PERIOD                                           VALID TEST SCORES

NOTAMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	722*	72%*	257	94

NOTBLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	719*	72%*	257	94

NOTHISPANICORLATINO	701*	72%*	248	93

NOTASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPAC…	717*	72%*	254	93

NOTWHITE	38	―	27	―

NOTMULTIRACIAL	704*	73%*	252	92

GENERALEDUCATION	614*	73%*	224	100

ENGLISHPROFICIENT	720*	72%*	257	93

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	315*	75%*	122	112

MALE	400*	68%*	132	94

FEMALE	326*	77%*	127	93

MIGRANT	0	―	0	―

NOTMIGRANT	726*	72%*	259	93

―Therewerefewerthan40studentsenrolledduringthetestadministrationperiod,sothePercentofEnrolledStudentswithValidTestScoresdataaresuppressedORtherewerefewerthan30testedstudentsenrolled onBEDSdayandduringthetestadministrationperiod,sothePI,EAMO,andSafeHarborTargetdataaresuppressed. *Thepercentageofstudentstestedinthecurrentyearfellbelow95percent,sothenumbersofenrolledandtestedstudentsinthecurrentyearandpreviousyearwerecombinedtoprovidetheschool/districtwith anotheropportunitytomeettheparticipationratecriterion.
✝Includesformerstudentswithdisabilitiesbecausethenumberofstudentswithdisabilitiesinthecurrentyearisequaltoorgreaterthan30.

34 of 42

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVELSCIENCERESULTSFORACCOUNTABILITY

ALLACCOUNTABILITYGROUPSMADE AYP: YES

GROUP
	MADE AYP	TESTED 80%		STUDENTS	PERCENT OF	PI>= EAMO OR       TESTED STUDENTS	PI	EAMO ENROLLED DURING          ENROLLED           PROGRESSTARGET ENROLLED ON BEDS
THE TEST	STUDENTSWITH	DAY ADMINISTRATION VALID TEST SCORES
PERIOD

PROGRESSTARGET

ALLSTUDENTS	YES

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	―

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	―

HISPANICORLATINO	―

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	―

WHITE	YES

MULTIRACIAL	―

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	―

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENT	―

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	YES

YES	138	85%	YES	111	191	179	179

―	1	―	―	1	―	―	―

―	2	―	―	1	―	―	―

―	3	―	―	3	―	―	―

―	2	―	―	2	―	―	―

YES	123	83%	YES	98	193	185	185

―	7	―	―	6	―	―	―

―	20	―	―	14	―	―	―

―	1	―	―	1	―	―	―

YES	75	81%	YES	58	186	170	170

RESULTSFORTHE FOLLOWINGGROUPSARE NOTUSED TO DETERMINE AYP.

GROUP
	STUDENTSENROLLED DURINGTHE TEST	PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTSWITH       TESTED STUDENTSENROLLED ON BEDSDAY	PI ADMINISTRATION PERIOD                                           VALID TEST SCORES

NOTAMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	137	85%	110	191

NOTBLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	136	85%	110	191

NOTHISPANICORLATINO	135	84%	108	191

NOTASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPAC…	136	85%	109	192

NOTWHITE	15	―	13	―

NOTMULTIRACIAL	131	84%	105	192

GENERALEDUCATION	118	86%	97	193

ENGLISHPROFICIENT	137	85%	110	191

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	63	89%	53	196

MALE	130*	78%*	58	188

FEMALE	61	92%	53	194

MIGRANT	0	―	0	―

NOTMIGRANT	138	85%	111	191

―Therewerefewerthan40studentsenrolledduringthetestadministrationperiod,sothePercentofEnrolledStudentswithValidTestScoresdataaresuppressedORtherewerefewerthan30testedstudentsenrolled onBEDSdayandduringthetestadministrationperiod,sothePI,EAMO,andProgressTargetdataaresuppressed. *Thepercentageofstudentstestedinthecurrentyearfellbelow80percent,sothenumbersofenrolledandtestedstudentsinthecurrentyearandpreviousyearwerecombinedtoprovidetheschool/districtwith anotheropportunitytomeettheparticipationratecriterion.

35 of 42

SECONDARY-LEVELENGLISHLANGUAGEARTSRESULTSFORACCOUNTABILITY

ALLACCOUNTABILITYGROUPSMADE AYP: NO

GROUP
	MADE AYP	TESTED 95%	12TH GRADERS       PERCENT OF 12TH PI>= EAMO ORSAFE	2013	PI	EAMO GRADERSWITH        HARBORTARGET      ACCOUNTABILITY
VALID TEST SCORES	COHORT MEMBERS

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET

ALLSTUDENTS	NO	YES

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	―	―

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	―	―

HISPANICORLATINO	―	―

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	―	―

WHITE	NO	YES

MULTIRACIAL	―	―

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	―	―

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENT	―	―

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	―	―

71	100%	NO

0	―	―

2	―	―

3	―	―

1	―	―

65	100%	NO

0	―	―

11	―	―

0	―	―

25	―	―

64	164	166	166

0	―	―	―

2	―	―	―

2	―	―	―

1	―	―	―

59	161	173	169

0	―	―	―

10	―	―	―

0	―	―	―

22	―	―	―

RESULTSFORTHE FOLLOWINGGROUPSARE NOTUSED TO DETERMINE AYP.

GROUP
	12TH GRADERS	PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERSWITH VALID        2013 ACCOUNTABILITYCOHORT MEMBERS	PI TEST SCORES

NOTAMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	71	100%	64	164

NOTBLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	69	100%	62	163

NOTHISPANICORLATINO	68	100%	62	163

NOTASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPAC…	70	100%	63	163

NOTWHITE	6	―	5	―

NOTMULTIRACIAL	71	100%	64	164

GENERALEDUCATION	60	100%	54	181

ENGLISHPROFICIENT	71	100%	64	164

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	46	100%	42	167

MALE	39	―	38	155

FEMALE	32	―	26	―

MIGRANT	0	―	0	―

NOTMIGRANT	71	100%	64	164

―Therewerefewerthan4012thgraders,sothePercentof12thGraderswithValidTestScoresdataaresuppressedORtherewerefewerthan30studentsinthe2013accountabilitycohort,soPI,EAMO,andSafe HarborTargetdataaresuppressed.

36 of 42

SECONDARY-LEVELMATHEMATICSRESULTSFORACCOUNTABILITY

ALLACCOUNTABILITYGROUPSMADE AYP: NO

GROUP
	MADE AYP	TESTED 95%	12TH GRADERS       PERCENT OF 12TH PI>= EAMO ORSAFE	2013	PI	EAMO GRADERSWITH        HARBORTARGET      ACCOUNTABILITY
VALID TEST SCORES	COHORT MEMBERS

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET

ALLSTUDENTS	NO	YES

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	―	―

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	―	―

HISPANICORLATINO	―	―

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	―	―

WHITE	NO	YES

MULTIRACIAL	―	―

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	―	―

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENT	―	―

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	―	―

71	100%	NO

0	―	―

2	―	―

3	―	―

1	―	―

65	100%	NO

0	―	―

11	―	―

0	―	―

25	―	―

64	122	153	137

0	―	―	―

2	―	―	―

2	―	―	―

1	―	―	―

59	117	162	138

0	―	―	―

10	―	―	―

0	―	―	―

22	―	―	―

RESULTSFORTHE FOLLOWINGGROUPSARE NOTUSED TO DETERMINE AYP.

GROUP
	12TH GRADERS	PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERSWITH VALID        2013 ACCOUNTABILITYCOHORT MEMBERS	PI TEST SCORES

NOTAMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	71	100%	64	122

NOTBLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	69	100%	62	119

NOTHISPANICORLATINO	68	100%	62	121

NOTASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPAC…	70	100%	63	121

NOTWHITE	6	―	5	―

NOTMULTIRACIAL	71	100%	64	122

GENERALEDUCATION	60	100%	54	135

ENGLISHPROFICIENT	71	100%	64	122

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	46	100%	42	133

MALE	39	―	38	118

FEMALE	32	―	26	―

MIGRANT	0	―	0	―

NOTMIGRANT	71	100%	64	122

―Therewerefewerthan4012thgraders,sothePercentof12thGraderswithValidTestScoresdataaresuppressedORtherewerefewerthan30studentsinthe2013accountabilitycohort,soPI,EAMO,andSafe HarborTargetdataaresuppressed.

37 of 42

UNWEIGHTEDCOMBINEDELAANDMATHPIS

GROUP
	ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVELELA PI	ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVELMATH PI	SECONDARY-LEVELELA PI       SECONDARY-LEVELMATH PI     UNWEIGHTED COMBINED P
	I

ALLSTUDENTS

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN

HISPANICORLATINO

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENT

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED
	101	93	164	122	120

―	―	―	―	0

―	―	―	―	0

―	―	―	―	0

―	―	―	―	0

101	92	161	117	118

―	―	―	―	0

60	58	―	―	59

―	―	―	―	0

88	77	―	―	83

― Therewerenotenough studentsto determineaPerformanceIndex.

OVERALLGRADUATIONRATEFORACCOUNTABILITY

ALLACCOUNTABILITYGROUPSMADE AYP: YES

GROUP
	
MADEAYP

ALLSTUDENTS

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN

HISPANICORLATINO

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFICISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENT

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED
	YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

― Therewerenotenough studentsto makean AYP determination.

38 of 42

FOUR-YEARGRADUATION-RATETOTALCOHORTFORACCOUNTABILITY

GROUP
	MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:	2012 FOUR-YEARGRADUATION-RATE TOTAL	GRADUATION RATE	STATE STANDARD	PROGRESSTARGET COHORT

ALLSTUDENTS	YES

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	―

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	―

HISPANICORLATINO	―

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	―

WHITE	YES

MULTIRACIAL	―

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	―

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENT	―

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	YES

73	93%	80%	80%

0	―	―	―

0	―	―	―

3	―	―	―

0	―	―	―

69	93%	80%	80%

1	―	―	―

8	―	―	―

1	―	―	―

44	91%	80%	80%

YESGraduationrateisequaltoorgreaterthantheStateStandardorthegroup'sProgressTarget. NOGraduationrateislessthantheStateStandardandthegroup'sProgressTarget. ―Therewerefewerthan30studentsinthecohort.

39 of 42

FIVE-YEARGRADUATION-RATETOTALCOHORTFORACCOUNTABILITY

GROUP
	MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:	2011 FIVE-YEARGRADUATION-RATE TOTAL	GRADUATION RATE	STATE STANDARD	PROGRESSTARGET COHORT

ALLSTUDENTS	YES

AMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	―

BLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	―

HISPANICORLATINO	―

ASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPACIFIC…	―

WHITE	YES

MULTIRACIAL	―

STUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES	―

LIMITEDENGLISHPROFICIENT	―

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	YES

72	90%	80%	80%

0	―	―	―

0	―	―	―

2	―	―	―

0	―	―	―

69	90%	80%	80%

1	―	―	―

15	―	―	―

0	―	―	―

37	86%	80%	80%

YESGraduationrateisequaltoorgreaterthantheStateStandardorthegroup'sProgressTarget. NOGraduationrateislessthantheStateStandardandthegroup'sProgressTarget. ―Therewerefewerthan30studentsinthecohort.

40 of 42

TOTALCOHORT
TOTALCOHORT
GRADUATIONRATESFORNON-AYPGROUPSFORACCOUNTABILITY

GROUP
	
FOUR-YEARGRADUATION-RATETOTALCOHORT
	
FIVE-YEARGRADUATION-RATETOTALCOHORT

	2012FOUR-YEARGRADUATION-RATE	GRADUATIONRATE
	2011FOUR-YEARGRADUATION-RATE	GRADUATIONRATE

NOTAMERICANINDIANORALASKA NATIVE	73	93%	72	90%

NOTBLACKORAFRICANAMERICAN	73	93%	72	90%

NOTHISPANICORLATINO	70	93%	70	90%

NOTASIANORNATIVEHAWAIIAN/OTHERPAC…	73	93%	72	90%

NOTWHITE	4	―	3	―

NOTMULTIRACIAL	72	93%	71	90%

GENERALEDUCATION	65	94%	57	98%

ENGLISHPROFICIENT	72	93%	72	90%

NOTECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED	29	―	35	94%

MALE	37	97%	32	88%

FEMALE	36	89%	40	93%

MIGRANT	0	―	0	―

NOTMIGRANT	73	93%	72	90%

― Therewerefewer than 30studentsin thecohort.

41 of 42

GraduationRatesforRegentswithAdvancedDesignationandCTEEndorsementforAccountability

Percentageof2012Graduation-RateTotalCohortmemberswhograduatedasofAugust31,2016with:

REGENTSDIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (THISDISTRICT)	25%

REGENTSDIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (STATEWIDE)	31%

PERCENTAGE IN THISDISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE	NO

REGENTSDIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (THISDISTRICT)
	16%

REGENTSDIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (STATEWIDE)
	5%

PERCENTAGE IN THISDISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE
	YES

©COPYRIGHTNEWYORKSTATEEDUCATIONDEPARTMENT,ALLRIGHTSRESERVED.

THISDOCUMENTWASCREATEDON:MARCH20,2018,8:27AMEST

42 of 42

Fiscal Accountability Summary

FISCALACCOUNTABILITYSUMMARY(2016-17)

INFORMATIONABOUTEXPENDITURERATIOS(2015-16) (Dataarelagged ayear.)

Commissioner's Regulations requirethatcertain expenditureratios for general-education and special-education students bereported and compared with ratios for similar districts and all public schools. Therequired ratios for this districtarereported below.

Thenumbers used to computethestatistics on this pagewerecollected on theStateAid Form A, theStateAid Form F, theSchool DistrictAnnual Financial Report(ST-3), and from the StudentInformation RepositorySystem (SIRS).

THISSCHOOLDISTRICT

GENERALEDUCATION

INSTRUCTIONALEXPENDITURES

$8,434,988

PUPILS

799

EXPENDITURESPERPUPIL

$10,557

SPECIALEDUCATION

INSTRUCTIONALEXPENDITURES

$3,146,238

PUPILS

106

EXPENDITURESPERPUPIL

$29,681

SIMILARDISTRICTGROUP AVERAGENEED/RESOURCECAPACITY

GENERALEDUCATION

INSTRUCTIONALEXPENDITURES

$8,395,886,432

PUPILS

747,643

EXPENDITURESPERPUPIL

$11,230

SPECIALEDUCATION

INSTRUCTIONALEXPENDITURES

$3,487,990,842

PUPILS

110,460

EXPENDITURESPERPUPIL

$31,577

1 of 3

ALLSCHOOLDISTRICTS

GENERALEDUCATION

INSTRUCTIONALEXPENDITURES

$33,423,609,457

PUPILS

2,649,519

EXPENDITURESPERPUPIL

$12,615

SPECIALEDUCATION

INSTRUCTIONALEXPENDITURES

$14,485,942,729

PUPILS

460,996

EXPENDITURESPERPUPIL

$31,423

Instructional Expenditures for General Education areK-12expenditures for classroom instruction (excludingSpecial Education)plus aproration of buildinglevel administrativeand instructional supportexpenditures. Theseexpenditures includeamounts for instruction of students with disabilities in ageneral-education setting. Districtexpenditures, such as transportation, debtserviceand district-wideadministration arenotincluded.

Thepupil countfor General Education is K-12averagedailymembership plus K-12pupils for whom thedistrictpays tuition to another school district. This number represents all pupils, includingthoseclassi ed as havingdisabilities and thosenotclassi ed, excludingonlystudents with disabilities placed outof district. Pupils residentin thedistrictbut attendingacharter school areincluded. For districts in which acountyjail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom thedistrictmustprovidean education program.

Instructional Expenditures for Special Education areK-12expenditures for students with disabilities (includingsummer special education expenditures)plus aproration of building-level administrativeand instructional supportexpenditures. Districtexpenditures, such as transportation, debtserviceand district-wideadministration arenotincluded.

Thepupil countfor Special Education is acountof K-12students with disabilities for theschool year plus students for whom thedistrictreceives tuition from another districtplus students for whom thedistrictpays tuition to another district. Students attendingtheStateschools atRomeand Batavia, privateplacements and out-of-stateplacements areincluded.

Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is thesimplearithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. Thetotal costof instruction for students with disabilities mayincludeboth general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in thegeneral-education classroom maybene tstudents notclassi ed as havingdisabilities.

TOTALEXPENDITURESPERPUPIL

THISSCHOOLDISTRICT

$21,263

SIMILARDISTRICTGROUP

$21,790

NYSTATE

$23,361

Total Expenditures Per Pupil is thesimplearithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures includedistrictexpenditures for classroom instruction, as well as expenditures for transportation, debtservice, communityserviceand district-wideadministration thatarenotincluded in theInstructional Expenditurevalues for General Education and Special Education. As such, thesum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does notequal theTotal Expenditures.

2 of 3

INFORMATIONABOUTSTUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES(2016-17)

Commissioner's Regulations requirereportingstudents with disabilities bythepercentof timetheyarein general education classrooms and theclassi cation rateof students with disabilities. Thesedataareto becompared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. Therequired percentages for this districtarereported below.

STUDENTPLACEMENT(PERCENTOFTIMEINSIDEREGULAR CLASSROOM)

THISSCHOOL DISTRICT

80%ORMORE

67
	
69.1%

40%-79%

2
	
2.1%

LESSTHAN40%

28
	
28.9%

SEPARATESETTINGS

0
	
0.0%

OTHERSETTINGS

0
	
0.0%

SIMILARDISTRICTGROUP AVERAGENEED/RESOURCECAPACITY

80%ORMORE

56.8%

40%-79%

19.1%

LESSTHAN40%

16.9%

SEPARATESETTINGS

4.5%

OTHERSETTINGS

2.7%

NYSTATE

80%ORMORE

58.4%

40%-79%

11.9%

LESSTHAN40%

19.6%

SEPARATESETTINGS

5.9%

OTHERSETTINGS

4.5%

Thesourcedatafor thestatistics in this tablewerereported through theStudentInformation RepositorySystem (SIRS)and veri ed in Veri cation Report5. Thecounts arenumbers of students reported in theleastrestrictiveenvironmentcategories for school-ageprograms (ages 6-21)on BEDSDay, which is the rstWednesdayof thereportingyear. Thepercentages representtheamountof timestudents with disabilities arein general-education classrooms, regardless of theamountand costof special-education services theyreceive. Roundingof percentagevalues maycausethem to sum to anumber slightlydifferentfrom 100%.

SCHOOL-AGESTUDENTSWITHDISABILITIESCLASSIFICATIONRATE

THISSCHOOLDISTRICT

12.4%

SIMILARDISTRICTGROUP

13.4%

NYSTATE

14.9%

This rateis aratio of thecountof school-agestudents with disabilities (ages 4-21)to thetotal enrollmentof all school-agestudents in theschool district, includingstudents who are parentallyplaced in nonpublic schools located in theschool district. Thenumerator includes all school-agestudents for whom adistricthas Committeeon Special Education (CSE) responsibilityto ensuretheprovision of special-education services. Thedenominator includes all school-agestudents who residein thedistrict. In thecaseof parentallyplaced students in nonpublic schools, itincludes thenumber of students who attend thenonpublic schools located in theschool district. Sourcedataaredrawn from theSIRSand from the Basic Education DataSystem (BEDS).

Similar DistrictGroups areidenti ed accordingto theNeed-to-Resource-CapacityIndex. Moreinformation is availableon our NRC capacitycategories page.

© COPYRIGHTNEWYORKSTATEEDUCATIONDEPARTMENT,ALLRIGHTSRESERVED.

THISDOCUMENTWASCREATEDON:MARCH20,2018,8:30AMEST

3 of 3

Administrative Compensation Information

New York State Education Department State Aid Management System (SAMS)	Page 1 of 5

Salary: Administrative Compensation Information

080201 - BAINBRIDGE-GUILFORD

Form Due May 7, 2018

2017-2018 - Page 1 Official - as of 04/26/2018 10:21
AM

2018-2019 Salary Threshold = $135,000

In response to legislative efforts to encourage greater cost sharing in service provision and local government administration, we now provide a section for districts that share administrative staff to highlight these efforts for the upcoming school year. Each sharing district should identify in the form the other district(s) with which they will be sharing administrative staff for school year 2018-2019.

If you will be sharing a Superintendent, list the other district (or districts) in the text box. If you will be sharing other administrative staff required to be reported, please send an email to EMSCMGTS@nysed.gov indicating the title of the staff persons(s) as well as the other district(s) involved in the cost-sharing.

The salaries, benefits and other compensation reported in the form should reflect only the financial support or commitment that your district will be making. They should not reflect the total amounts budgeted to be paid by all participating districts over the school year.

Report Estimated Salaries in the Budget for the 2018-2019 School Year

Sections 1608 and 1716 of the Education Law

(Please read the instructions and definitions before completing this form.)

Title	Salary	Employee Benefits

Other Remuneration

1.
	Superintendent of Schools
	135,960
		44,548
	8,065

Please list the district or districts with which you will be sharing a superintendent (if applicable):

Associate, Assistant and Deputy Superintendents

(Example Titles: Associate Superintendent for Instruction, Deputy Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent for Business, etc.)

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.

https://eservices.nysed.gov/sams/printForm.do?method=printForm&fsId=826&segmentKe... 4/26/2018

Property Tax Exemption Impact Reports

NYS - Real Property System

County of Chenango

Assessor's Report - 2017 - Prior Year File S495 Exemption Impact Report
School District Summary

RPS221/V04/L001 Date/Time - 3/27/2018 10:18:52
Total Assessed Value	317,895,787

Equalized Total Assessed Value	328,281,210

School District - 082201 Bain-Guilf Cen Sch

Exemption Code

13500 13650 13800 13870 18020 21600 25110 25230 25300 26250 26400 27350 41130 41140 41400 41700 41720 41800 41805 41834 41844 41854 41864 42100 47100 47450 47460 47610 49500
50005

Exemption Name

TOWN - GENERALLY VG - GENERALLY SCHOOL DISTRICT
SPEC DIST USED FOR PURPOSE EST MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEV AGENC RES OF CLERGY - RELIG CORP OWN NONPROF CORP - RELIG(CONST PRO NONPROF CORP - MORAL/MENTAL IM NONPROF CORP - SPECIFIED USES HISTORICAL SOCIETY
INC VOLUNTEER FIRE CO OR DEPT PRIVATELY OWNED CEMETERY LAND ALT VET EX-WAR PERIOD-COMBAT ALT VET EX-WAR PERIOD-DISABILI CLERGY
AGRICULTURAL BUILDING AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER ENHANCED STAR
En STAR (land belongs to other BASIC STAR 1999-2000
Basic STAR (land belongs to ot SILOS, MANURE STORAGE TANKS, Mass Telecomm Ceiling FOREST/REF LAND - FISHERACT FOREST LAND CERTDAFTER 8/74
BUSINESS INVESTMENT PROPERTY P SOLAR OR WIND ENERGY SYSTEM
SYSTEM CODE

Statutory Authority

RPTL 406(1) RPTL 406(1) RPTL 408 RPTL 410 RPTL 412-a RPTL 462 RPTL 420-a RPTL 420-a RPTL 420-b RPTL 444 RPTL 464(2) RPTL 446 RPTL 458-a RPTL 458-a RPTL 460 RPTL 483
AG-MKTS L 305 RPTL 467 RPTL 467 RPTL 425 RPTL 425 RPTL 425 RPTL 425 RPTL 483-a
RPTL S499-qqqq RPTL 480
RPTL 480-a RPTL 485-b RPTL 487
STATUTORYAUTH NOT DEFINED

Number of Exemptions

24 34 7 1 1 2 12 3 4 2 3 20 1 1 2 11
178 14 17 422 1 967 5
4 5 4 42 3 1
1

Total Equalized Value of Exemptions

2,317,400 2,487,300 10,059,100 16,800 74,700 254,300 2,540,129 1,313,800 130,800 69,100 108,800 383,808
0 0
3,749 343,760 5,968,097 487,249 415,035 26,999,762 4,200 30,683,769 63,600 74,351 50,871 220,694 2,037,100 128,731 10,000
0

Percent of Value Exempted

0.71 0.76 3.06 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.77 0.40 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 1.82 0.15 0.13 8.22 0.00 9.35 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.62 0.04 0.00
0.00

Page 1 of 2

NYS - Real Property System

County of Chenango

Assessor's Report - 2017 - Prior Year File S495 Exemption Impact Report
School District Summary

RPS221/V04/L001 Date/Time - 3/27/2018 10:18:52
Total Assessed Value	317,895,787

Equalized Total Assessed Value	328,281,210

School District - 082201 Bain-Guilf Cen Sch

Exemption Code

Exemption Name

Statutory Authority

Number of Exemptions

Total Equalized Value of Exemptions

Percent of Value Exempted

50006	SYSTEM CODE	STATUTORYAUTH NOT DEFINED	1	0	0.00

Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions:

Total System Exemptions:

Totals:

1,791                                                 87,247,005                                                 26.58 2                                                                 0                                                   0.00
1,793	87,247,005	26.58

for municipal services.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes:	__________________

Page 2 of 2

NYS - Real Property System

County of Otsego

Assessor's Report - 2017 - Prior Year File S495 Exemption Impact Report
School District Summary

RPS221/V04/L001 Date/Time - 4/10/2018 09:15:33
Total Assessed Value	4,003,006

Equalized Total Assessed Value	6,158,471

School District - 082201 Bainbridge-Guilfor

Exemption Code

13650 41834 41854
47610

Exemption Name

VG - GENERALLY ENHANCED STAR BASIC STAR 1999-2000
BUSINESS INVESTMENT PROPERTY P

Statutory Authority

RPTL 406(1) RPTL 425 RPTL 425
RPTL 485-b

Number of Exemptions

1 6 14
1

Total Equalized Value of Exemptions

2,615 373,263 436,615
170,412

Percent of Value Exempted

0.04 6.06 7.09
2.77

Total Exemptions Exclusive of System Exemptions:

Total System Exemptions:

Totals:

22                                                      982,905                                                 15.96 0                                                                 0                                                   0.00
22	982,905	15.96

for municipal services.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Values have been equalized using the Uniform Percentage of Value. The Exempt amounts do not take into consideration, payments in lieu of taxes or other payments

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Amount, if any, attributable to payments in lieu of taxes:	__________________

Page 1 of 1